Disruption of long-term psychological distress trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from three British birth cohorts
Moreno-Agostino, D.; Fisher, H. L.; Goodman, A.; Hatch, S. L.; Morgan, C.; Richards, M.; Das-Munshi, J.; Ploubidis, G. B.
Show abstract
ImportanceMental health disorders were among the leading global contributors to years lived with disability prior to the COVID-19 pandemic onset, and growing evidence suggests that population mental health outcomes have worsened since the pandemic started. The extent that these changes have altered common age-related trends in psychological distress, where distress typically rises until mid-life and then falls in both sexes, is unknown. ObjectiveTo analyse whether long-term pre-pandemic psychological distress trajectories have altered during the pandemic, and whether these changes have been different across generations and by sex. DesignCross-cohort study with prospective data collection over a 40-year period (earliest time point: 1981; latest time point: February/March 2021). SettingPopulation-based (adult general population), Great Britain. ParticipantsMembers of three nationally representative birth cohorts which comprised all people born in Great Britain in a single week of 1946, 1958, or 1970, and who participated in at least one of the data collection waves conducted after the start of the pandemic (40.6%, 42.8%, 39.4%, respectively). Exposure(s)Time, COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Psychological distress factor scores, as measured by validated self-reported questionnaires. Results16,389 participants (2,175 from the 1946 birth cohort, 52.8% women; 7,446 from the 1958 birth cohort, 52.4% women; and 6,768 from the 1970 birth cohort, 56.2% women) participated in the study. By September/October 2020, psychological distress levels had reached or exceeded the levels of the peak in the pre-pandemic life-course trajectories, with larger increases in younger cohorts: Standardised Mean Differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of -0.02 [-0.07, 0.04], 0.05 [0.02, 0.07], and 0.09 [0.07, 0.12] for the 1946, 1958, and 1970 birth cohorts, respectively. Increases in distress were larger among women than men, widening the pre-existing inequalities observed in the pre-pandemic peak and in the most recent pre-pandemic assessment. Conclusions and RelevancePre-existing long-term psychological distress trajectories of adults born between 1946 and 1970 were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among women, who reached the highest levels ever recorded in up to 40 years of follow-up data. This may impact future trends of morbidity, disability, and mortality due to common mental health problems.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the Global South: evidence from a four-country cohort study 94%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation Among Unpaid Caregivers in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationships to Age, Race/Ethnicity, Employment, and Caregiver Intensity 93%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Father absence and trajectories of offspring mental health across adolescence and young adulthood: findings from a UK-birth cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological distress among people with probable COVID-19 infection: analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study 96%
- Did social factors buffer against the effect of adversities on self-harm during the COVID-19 pandemic? A longitudinal analysis of 49,227 UK adults 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adult life-course trajectories of psychological distress and economic outcomes in midlife during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- How is the distribution of psychological distress changing over time? Who is driving these changes? Analysis of the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts 95%
- Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal trends in primary care-recorded self-harm during and beyond the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: time series analysis of electronic healthcare records for 2.8 million patients in the Greater Manchester Care Record 92%
- COVID-19 among migrants, refugees, and internally displaced persons: systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of the global empirical literature 91%
- Suicide and depression in former contact sports participants: population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.