Back

Dynamics and Energetics of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) Fluke-and-Glide Gait

Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Gabaldon, J.; Lauderdale, L.; Miller, L.; Barton, K.; Shorter, K. A.

2022-04-20 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.04.19.488827 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intermittent locomotion composed of periods of active flapping/stroking followed by inactive gliding has been observed with species that inhabit both aerial and marine environments. However, studies on the energetic benefits of a fluke-and-glide (FG) gait during horizontal locomotion are limited for dolphins. This work presents a physics-based model of FG gait and analysis of the associated costs of transport of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). New estimates of gliding drag coefficients for the model were estimated experimentally from free-swimming bottlenose dolphins. The data-driven approach used kinematic measurement from 84 hours of biologging tag data collected from 3 animals to estimate the coefficients. A set of 532 qualified gliding events were automatically extracted for gliding drag coefficient estimation, and an additional 783 FG bouts were parameterized and used to inform the model-based dynamic analysis. Experimental results indicate that FG gait was preferred at speeds around 2.2 - 2.7 m/s. Observed FG bouts had an average duty factor of 0.45 and gliding duration of 5 sec. The average associated metabolic cost of transport (COT) and mechanical cost of transport (MECOT) of FG gait are 2.53 and 0.35 J {middle dot} m-1 {middle dot} kg-1 at the preferred speeds. This corresponded to an 18.9% and 27.1% reduction in cost when compared to modeled continuous fluking gait at the same reference speed. Average thrust was positively correlated with fluking frequency and amplitude as animals accelerated during the FG bouts. While fluking frequency and amplitude were negatively correlated for a given thrust range. These results support the supposition that FG gait enhances the horizontal swimming efficiency of bottlenose dolphins and provides new dynamical insights into the gait of these animals.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%