TITAN: A Toolbox for Information-Theoretic Analysis of Molecular Networks
Bergmans, T.; Celikel, T.
Show abstract
Molecular, cellular, structural, and functional networks in the brain each represent different levels of organization and complexity. These networks are interconnected, and their interactions underlie the brains abilities to process information, regulate bodily functions, and mediate behavior. While understanding the emergence of higher-level networks (structural and functional) from the interactions of lower-level (molecular and cellular) ones is crucial, a universal analytical method applicable to all brain network types has been lacking. Here we introduce an open-source toolbox (NETSCOPE) that identifies weighted network architectures using mutual information (MI) and variation of information (VI). We demonstrate the accuracy of the resulting networks using synthetic data and by recreating five molecular networks in S. cerevisiae. We finally deploy NETSCOPE to identify cell type specific transcriptional networks and reconstruct the brain-wide neural networks that encode touch in the mouse brain. The code is made available in Python, Google Colab, Jupyter Notebook, MATLAB, and Octave. Beyond its core functionality, this network discovery method holds potential for broader applications, including the development of bioinspired sparse artificial networks.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CoVar: A generalizable machine learning approach to identify the coordinated regulators driving variational gene expression 97%
- Application of Modular Response Analysis to Medium- to Large-Size Biological Systems 96%
- Reconstruction Set Test (RESET): a computationally efficient method for single sample gene set testing based on randomized reduced rank reconstruction error 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.