Art therapy as treatment modality for persons living with dementia- a protocol for a scoping review of systematic reviews
Guseva, E.; Wilchesky, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo establish a robust understanding of the state of the evidence on the effectiveness and/or efficacy of art therapy (AT) as a non-pharmacological treatment (NPT) modality for persons living with dementia (PLWD). BackgroundOver the past decade, AT has received increased attention from health care professionals and researchers as having a potential role to play within treatment plans for PLWD.(1-4) Inclusion criteriaThis scoping review will include systematic reviews from health-related disciplines conducted within the last 20 years that report the effectiveness and/or efficacy of AT as an NPT modality for PLWD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) as their main objective. Study outcomes must include cognition, quality of life, emotional and psychological well-being, and/or neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). MethodsA scoping review of systematic reviews was selected to outline different types of evidence and to identify gaps in the literature. The proposed review will be guided by the methodological framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will therefore specify the research question, identify relevant studies, select eligible studies, extract, collate, and summarize our results. We will not conduct a quality appraisal of the included studies as this review aims to explore the general scope of research conducted that assesses AT effectiveness and efficacy in PLWD.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 95%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 95%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 93%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 93%
- Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use – a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 92%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 91%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 92%
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 91%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.