Using Facebook groups to support families: midwives perceptions and experiences of professional social media use
Morse, H.; Brown, A.
Show abstract
Seeking support from Facebook groups during pregnancy is now widespread and social media has been widely used by maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, little is currently known about midwives attitudes towards, and experiences of social media in practice. Research is needed to understand barriers and solutions to meeting mothers expectations of online support and to improve services. This study explored midwife involvement in Facebook groups, exploring experiences and perceptions of its use to communicate with and support mothers. 719 midwives and student midwives completed an online survey during August-September 2020 and their numerical and free-text responses analysed descriptively. Few participants were involved in providing Facebook support, and most of these were unpaid. There was a consensus on a range of benefits for mothers, but widespread concern that engaging with mothers online was a personal and professional risk, underpinned by a lack of support. Experience of being involved in midwife moderation increased belief in its benefits and reduced fear of engaging online, despite a lack of renumeration and resources. Midwives and students felt they were discouraged from offering Facebook support and sought further training, guidance and support. Although limited, experiences of providing Facebook group support are positive. Perceptions of risk and a lack of support are significant barriers to midwives involvement in using Facebook groups to support mothers. Midwives seek support and training to safely and effectively engage with mothers using Facebook. Engaging with mothers via social media is embedded in national policy and digital strategy, and progress is needed to fulfil these, to improve services and meet mothers expectations. Midwives experiences suggest extending opportunities to provide Facebook support would benefit midwives, services and families. Consultation to revise local policy to support midwives and students in line with strategic goals is recommended. Author SummarySocial media use continues to grow and we know that use among pregnant and new parents for peer support and accessing information is widespread. Previous research suggests however that they can find it difficult to know which information to trust, and would like to engage with their midwives online. However, little was known about how many midwives are supporting families via social media, or what their experiences of this are. Nor did we know what the perceptions of developing this service are amongst the workforce. Here, we used an online survey to explore these attitudes and perceptions. We found that although few midwives are engaging with families on social media, those that do have positive experiences. Many fear that a lack of support and guidance presents risks to themselves and to families, but recognised the potential benefits to developing the service. We also found that midwives would like to receive more training to deliver services online and engage safely on social media. Our study provides new insights that can be used to improve support for midwives and to realise the potential of social media in midwifery care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 96%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 96%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 98%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 95%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 91%
- Iterative Development of a Mobile Phone Application to Support Community Health Volunteers during Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 96%
- Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives 95%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 91%
- Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals 91%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.