Back

Declining National Codeine Distribution in United States Hospitals and Pharmacies from 2011 to 2019

Kennalley, A. L.; Boureghda, Y. A.; Ganesh, J. G.; Watkins, A. M.; McCall, K. L.; Piper, B. J.

2022-04-13 pain medicine
10.1101/2022.04.12.22273805 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPast research has identified pronounced regional disparities in use of different opioids but less is known for codeine. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the trends of distribution of prescriptions containing codeine in the United States (US) from 2010 to 2019. In addition, this study aimed to identify regional disparities in prescribed milligrams of codeine per person in 2019 and identify any unusual states. MethodsThe distribution of codeine via pharmacies, hospitals, and practitioners in kilograms was obtained from the Drug Enforcement Administrations Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System (ARCOS) from 2010 to 2019. In addition, the number of prescriptions of codeine per 1,000 Medicaid enrollees was obtained from the State Drug Utilization Database. ResultsThe total grams of codeine decreased (-25.0%) through all distributors from 2010 to 2019. The largest increase in total grams of codeine distributed between two consecutive years (2014 to 2015) was +28.9%. For a given distributor type, the largest decrease from 2010 to 2019 was hospitals (-89.6%). In 2019, the total mg of codeine per person distributed in Texas (11.46) was significantly higher relative to the national average (3.06, 1.88 SD). Codeine prescriptions to Medicaid patients peeked in the third quarter of 2016. ConclusionThe peak of prescription codeine in 2011 was consistent with the overall peak in prescription opioids, with a subsequent decrease over the decade. This could be explained by relatively recent recommendations regarding the therapeutic use of codeine and how other antitussive agents may be of better use. The precipitous rise of codeine in Texas that we observed has been recognized in prior studies. These state-level disparities warrant further attention by opioid stewardship committees.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
3
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
19
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
20
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%