Declining National Codeine Distribution in United States Hospitals and Pharmacies from 2011 to 2019
Kennalley, A. L.; Boureghda, Y. A.; Ganesh, J. G.; Watkins, A. M.; McCall, K. L.; Piper, B. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundPast research has identified pronounced regional disparities in use of different opioids but less is known for codeine. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the trends of distribution of prescriptions containing codeine in the United States (US) from 2010 to 2019. In addition, this study aimed to identify regional disparities in prescribed milligrams of codeine per person in 2019 and identify any unusual states. MethodsThe distribution of codeine via pharmacies, hospitals, and practitioners in kilograms was obtained from the Drug Enforcement Administrations Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System (ARCOS) from 2010 to 2019. In addition, the number of prescriptions of codeine per 1,000 Medicaid enrollees was obtained from the State Drug Utilization Database. ResultsThe total grams of codeine decreased (-25.0%) through all distributors from 2010 to 2019. The largest increase in total grams of codeine distributed between two consecutive years (2014 to 2015) was +28.9%. For a given distributor type, the largest decrease from 2010 to 2019 was hospitals (-89.6%). In 2019, the total mg of codeine per person distributed in Texas (11.46) was significantly higher relative to the national average (3.06, 1.88 SD). Codeine prescriptions to Medicaid patients peeked in the third quarter of 2016. ConclusionThe peak of prescription codeine in 2011 was consistent with the overall peak in prescription opioids, with a subsequent decrease over the decade. This could be explained by relatively recent recommendations regarding the therapeutic use of codeine and how other antitussive agents may be of better use. The precipitous rise of codeine in Texas that we observed has been recognized in prior studies. These state-level disparities warrant further attention by opioid stewardship committees.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Opioid Overdose and Naloxone Administration Knowledge and Perceived Competency in A Probability Sample of Indiana Urban Communities with Large Black Populations 94%
- Estimating The Uncertain Effect of the COVID Pandemic on Drug Overdoses 94%
- Exploring consumer preferences for cannabis edible products to support public health policy: A discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline 88%
- DrugWAS: Leveraging drug-wide association studies to facilitate drug repurposing for COVID-19 88%
- Role of Drugs used for chronic disease management on Susceptibility and Severity of COVID-19: A Large Case-Control Study 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacoepidemiology of Oxycodone in the USA: an observational study of ARCOS, Medicaid, and Medicare drug databases 98%
- Declines, and Pronounced Regional Disparities, in Meperidine Use in the United States 97%
- Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions of the Type 2 Antidiabetic Drug Class Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4i): Can polypharmacology help explain? 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and Patterns of Opioid Epidemic: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study of Hospital Visits with Opioid Poisoning in New York State, 2010-2016 95%
- Optimizing hospital opioid deprescribing: a multi-level consensus study bridging evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives 93%
- A Systematic review and Network Meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships of Prescription Opioid Sales to Opiate Treatment Admissions and Overdose Deaths: A Reanalysis of Relationships -- United States 2010-2019 97%
- Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study 85%
- Three-month outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.