Evaluation of Outdoor swimming courses as an intervention to refresh and revitalise NHS workers
Pett, P.; Denton, H.; Burlingham, A.; Massey, H.; Harper, C. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundFrontline healthcare staff working in the National Health Service (NHS) have been, and continue to be, under a significant level of work related stress as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Long hours and greater clinical need have impacted negatively on work-life balance. The results of our preliminary studies indicate that outdoor swimming may be an effective treatment for anxiety and depression. We therefore hypothesised that the activity could improve symptoms of work-related burnout and stress in NHS workers. The primary objective of this study was to gather feedback from NHS staff participating in supervised swimming sessions that took place in an outdoor pool in London and the sea in Cornwall on the value and effectiveness of this initiative as they perceived it. MethodsFollowing ethical approval (University of Portsmouth Science and Health research ethics committee SHFEC 2021-066), participants who had signed up to outdoor swimming courses provided by NHS Improvement in Cornwall and London were asked to give their consent to participate in an online survey. They were asked to complete them at three time-points: the week prior to, upon completion and six weeks after completion of the outdoor swimming course. As well as being asked for qualitative feedback, participants completed the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Results85 (63.9%) of the 133 Participants who signed up to outdoor swimming courses completed the first survey, 62 (49.6%) the second and 43 (35.5%) the third. 41 (33.8%) completed all three surveys. Overall, there was a 14.8% increase in wellbeing scores when comparing the scores before and after the courses which was statistically significant (p<0.0001, d= 1.02). Compared to scores before the course, the scores at its conclusion were reduced by 25%, 18% and 18% in personal, work-related and client-related burnout respectively. These burnout scores were significantly different for personal (P<0.0001) and work-related burnout (P=0.0018). Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive with the effects being broadly divided into those relating to mood and physical health, the social aspects of the group activity, feelings of achievement and self-care and mindfulness. ConclusionThis research suggests that the outdoor swimming activity, as a workplace intervention, can be an effective way of promoting staff wellbeing and reducing personal and work-related burnout. Further, formal trials of this intervention are justified.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘The illness isn’t the end of the road’ - Patient perspectives on the initiation of and early participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme 96%
- Measuring the impact of an interdisciplinary learning project on nursing, architecture and landscape design students empathy 95%
- The dark side of streaking: Examining the backfire potential of run streaking in recreational runners who broke a long-term streak. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 95%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 94%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low uptake of COVID-19 lateral flow testing among university students: a mixed methods evaluation 92%
- Factors associated with adherence to self-isolation and lockdown measures in the UK; a cross-sectional survey 91%
- Factors associated with nonessential workplace attendance during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK in early 2021: evidence from cross-sectional surveys 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 94%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
- The efficacy of a virtual reality exposure therapy treatment for fear of flying: A retrospective study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.