Back

Multiple Cost Optimisation for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis

McCombe, N.; Ding, X.; Prasad, G.; Finn, D. P.; Todd, S.; McClean, P. L.; Wong-Lin, K.

2022-04-16 neurology
10.1101/2022.04.10.22273666 medRxiv
Show abstract

Current machine learning techniques for dementia diagnosis often do not take into account real-world practical constraints, which may include, for example, the cost of diagnostic assessment time and financial budgets. In this work, we built on previous cost-sensitive feature selection approaches by generalising to multiple cost types, while taking into consideration that stakeholders attempting to optimise the dementia care pathway might face multiple non-fungible budget constraints. Our new optimisation algorithm involved the searching of cost-weighting hyperparameters while constrained by total budgets. We then provided a proof of concept using both assessment time cost and financial budget cost. We showed that budget constraints could control the feature selection process in an intuitive and practical manner, while adjusting the hyperparameter increased the range of solutions selected by feature selection. We further showed that our budget-constrained cost optimisation framework could be implemented in a user-friendly graphical user interface sandbox tool to encourage non-technical users and stakeholders to adopt and to further explore and audit the model - a humans-in-the-loop approach. Overall, we suggest that setting budget constraints initially and then fine tuning the cost-weighting hyperparameters can be an effective way to perform feature selection where multiple cost constraints exist, which will in turn lead to more realistic optimising and redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical RelevanceBy optimising diagnostic accuracy against various costs (e.g. assessment administration time and financial budget), predictive yet practical dementia diagnostic assessments can be redesigned to suit clinical use.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
3
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
12
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
13
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%