Back

Combined Infection Control Interventions Protect the Essential Workforce from Occupationally-Acquired SARS-CoV-2 during Produce Production, Harvesting and Processing Activities

Cooper, D. K.; Sobolik, J. S.; Kovacevic, J.; Rock, C.; Sajewski, E. T.; Guest, J. L.; Lopman, B. A.; Jaykus, L.-A.; Leon, J. S.

2022-04-07 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.04.06.22273125 medRxiv
Show abstract

Essential food workers experience an elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to prolonged occupational exposures (e.g., frequent close contact, enclosed spaces) in food production and processing areas, shared transportation (car or bus), and employer-provided shared housing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of combined food industry interventions and vaccination on reducing the daily cumulative risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for produce workers. Six linked quantitative microbial risk assessment models were developed in R to simulate daily scenarios experienced by a worker. Standard industry interventions (2 m physical distancing, handwashing, surface disinfection, universal masking, increased ventilation) and two-dose mRNA vaccinations (86-99% efficacy) were modeled individually and jointly to assess risk reductions. The infection risk for an indoor (0.802, 95% Uncertainty Interval [UI]: 0.472-0.984) and outdoor (0.483, 95% UI: 0.255-0.821) worker was reduced to 0.018 (93% reduction) and 0.060 (87.5% reduction) after implementation of combined industry interventions. Upon integration of these interventions with vaccination, the infection risk for indoor (0.001, 95% UI: 0.0001-0.005) and outdoor (0.004, 95% UI: 0.001-0.016) workers was reduced by [≥]99.1%. Food workers face considerable risk of occupationally-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection without interventions; however, consistent implementation of key infection control measures paired with vaccination effectively mitigates these risks. SynopsisBundled interventions, particularly if they include vaccination, produce significant reductions (>99%) in SARS-CoV-2 infection risk for essential food workers. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=187 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22273125v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (69K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@742eb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a58ca7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b530feorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a379b3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.