Severity and Correlates of Mental Fog in People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Bell, T. R.; Crowe, M.; Novack, T.; Davis, R.; Stavrinos, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveAlongside objective performance declines, self-reported cognitive symptoms after traumatic brain injury (TBI) abound. Mental fog is one symptom that has been underexplored. The current project investigated mental fog across two studies of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury and moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury to close our knowledge gap about differences in severity. We then explored the cognitive and affective correlates of mental fog within these groups. MethodsUsing between-groups designs, the first study recruited individuals with acute mild TBI (n = 15) along with a healthy control group (n = 16). Simultaneously, a second study recruited persons with post-acute moderate-to-severe TBI, a stage when self-reports are most reliable (n = 15). Measures across the studies were harmonized and involved measuring mental fog (Mental Clutter Scale), objective cognition (Cogstate(R) and UFOV(R)), and depressive symptoms. In addition to descriptive group difference analyses, nonparametric correlations determined associations between mental fog, objective cognition, and depressive symptoms. ResultsResults revealed higher self-reported mental fog in acute mild TBI compared to healthy controls. And though exploratory, post-acute moderate-to-severe TBI also appears characterized by greater mental fog. Correlations showed that mental fog in mild TBI corresponded to greater depressive symptoms (r = .66) but was unrelated to objective cognition. By contrast, mental fog in moderate-to-severe TBI corresponded to poorer working memory (r = .68) and slowed processing speed (r = -.55) but was unrelated to depressive symptoms. ConclusionAs a common symptom in TBI, mental fog distinguishes individuals with acute mild TBI from uninjured peers. Mental fog also appears to reflect challenges in recovery, including depressive symptoms and objective cognitive problems. Screening for mental fog, in addition to other cognitive symptoms, might be worthwhile in these populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 93%
- Atypical somatic symptoms in adults with prolonged recovery from mild traumatic brain injury 92%
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence and Predictors of Neuropsychiatric manifestations following a Traumatic Brain Injury in Referral Hospitals in Dodoma, Tanzania: a protocol of a prospective longitudinal observational study 94%
- The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz 93%
- Body image and appearance distress among military veterans and civilians with an injury-related visible difference: A comparison study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive neuropsychological and neuroanatomic predictors of naturalistic action performance in left hemisphere stroke: a retrospective analysis 93%
- Recovery of clinical, cognitive and cortical activity measures following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a longitudinal investigation 93%
- Social problems and brain structure development following childhood mild traumatic brain injury 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atypical Resting State Functional Connectivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury 92%
- No effect of tDCS on fatigue and depression in chronic stroke patients: an exploratory randomized sham-controlled trial combining tDCS with computerized cognitive training 91%
- Neurophysiologic evidence for increased memory suppression among negative ruminators 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.