Back

Long-term psychological consequences of long Covid: a propensity score matching analysis comparing trajectories of depression and anxiety symptoms before and after contracting long Covid vs short Covid

Fancourt, D.; Steptoe, A.; Bu, F.

2022-04-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.04.01.22273305 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing global awareness of the psychological consequences of long Covid, supported by emerging empirical evidence. However, the mergence and long-term trajectories of psychological symptoms following the infection are still unclear. AimsTo examine when psychological symptoms first emerge following the infection with SARS-CoV-2, and the long-term trajectories of psychological symptoms comparing long and short Covid groups. MethodsWe analysed longitudinal data from the UCL Covid-19 Social Study (March 2020-November 2021). We included data from adults living in England who reported contracting SARS-CoV-2 by November 2021 (N=3,115). Of these, 15.9% reported having had long Covid (N=495). They were matched to participants who had short Covid using propensity score matching on a variety of demographic, socioeconomic and health covariates (N=962, n=13,325) and data were further analysed using growth curve modelling. ResultsDepressive and anxiety symptoms increased immediately following the onset of infection in both long and short Covid groups. But the long Covid group had substantially greater initial increases in depressive symptoms and heightened levels over 22 months follow-up. Initial increases in anxiety were not significantly different between groups, but only the short Covid group experienced an improvement in anxiety over follow-up, leading to widening differences between groups. ConclusionsThe findings shed light on the psychobiological pathways involved in the development of psychological symptoms relating to long Covid. The results highlight the need for monitoring of mental health and provision of adequate support to be interwoven with diagnosis and treatment of the physical consequences of long Covid.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%