Back

What (if anything) is going on? Examining longitudinal associations between social media use and mental ill-health among young people

Kelly, Y.; Xue, B.; Booker, C.; Sacker, A.; Lacey, R.; Ploubidis, G.; Patalay, P.

2022-04-05 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.03.31.22273198 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesIn mid-adolescence, to 1) examine cyclical associations between social media use and mental ill health by investigating longitudinal and bidirectional associations, dose response relationships, and changes in social media use and in mental health; 2) assess potential interaction effects between social media use and mental health with pre-existing early life vulnerabilities. MethodsLongitudinal data on 12,114 participants from the Millennium Cohort Study on social media use, depressive symptoms, self-harm and early life risk factors were used. ResultsWe found little support for the existence of cyclical relationships between social media use and mental health. Where detected, effect sizes were small. Dose response associations were seen in the direction of mental health to social media (depressive symptoms 1 time OR=1.22, 2 times OR=1.71; self-harm 1 time OR=1.17, 2 times OR=1.53), but not for social media to mental health. Changes in social media use and changes in mental health were not associated with each other. We found no evidence to suggest that either social media use or mental health interacted with pre-existing risk for mental ill health. ConclusionsFindings highlight the possibility that observed longitudinal associations between social media use and mental health might reflect other risk processes or vulnerabilities and/or the precision of measures used. More detailed and frequently collected prospective data about online experiences, including those from social media platforms themselves will help to provide a clearer picture of the relationship between social media use and mental health.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.