Birth anthropometry among three Asian ethnic groups in Singapore -- new growth charts
Sensaki, S.; Mao, Y.; Biswas, A.; Amutha, C.; Amin, Z.; Cook, A. R.; Lee, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe analyse birth anthropometry of Asian babies and its socioeconomic exposures, develop gestational age and gender-specific birth anthropometry charts and compare to the widely used Fenton chart. DesignRetrospective observational study. SettingDepartment of Neonatology at the National University Hospital in Singapore. Population or sampleWe report data from 52 220 Chinese, Indian and Malay infants, born from 1991-1997 and from 2010-2017 in Singapore. MethodsThe BW, length and head circumference are each modelled with maternal exposures using general additive model. Anthropometry charts are built using smoothed centile curve and compared with Fenton charts using binomial test. Main outcome measuresBW, head circumference, crown-heel length. ResultsIn contrast to the marked differences in birth anthropometry among these ethnic populations, when exposed to a uniform socioeconomic environment, their intrauterine growth and birth anthropometry were almost identical. From the gestational age specific anthropometric charts, until about late prematurity, Asian growth curves, as derived from our cohort, mirrored that of Fentons; thereafter, Asian babies showed a marked reduction in growth velocity. ConclusionsThese findings suggest comparative slowing of intrauterine growth among Asian babies towards term gestation. This phenomenon may be explained by two possible postulations, firstly, restrictive effects of a smaller uterus of shorter Asian women towards term and secondly, early maturation and senescence of fetoplacental unit among Asians. In clinical practice the new birth anthropometry charts will more accurately identify true fetal growth restriction as well as true postnatal growth failure in preterm infants when applied to the appropriate population. FundingSingapore Population Health Improvement Centre (NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 94%
- Sex ratios and ‘missing women’ among Asian minority and migrant populations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- Cohort profile of the ICMR-Stillbirth Pooled India Cohort (ICMR-SPIC): Estimating Prevalence, Analyzing Risk Factors, and Developing Prediction Models for Stillbirths in India 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between caesarean section delivery and later life obesity in 21-24 year olds in an Urban South African birth cohort 94%
- A compelling symmetry: The extended fetuses-at-risk perspective on modal, optimal and relative birthweight and gestational age 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of factors associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study 92%
- Spatial distribution and factors associated with low birth weight in Ethiopia using data from Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016: spatial and multilevel analysis. 91%
- Non-invasive detection of bilirubin concentrations during the first week of life in a low-resource setting along the Thailand-Myanmar border 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study 95%
- Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort 94%
- Association between food environments and fetal growth in pregnant Brazilian women 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.