Effect of MAOA DNA methylation on human in vivo protein expression measured by harmine PET in healthy and depressed individuals
Handschuh, P. A.; Murgas, M.; Vraka, C.; Nics, L.; Hartmann, A. M.; Winkler-Pjrek, E.; Baldinger-Melich, P.; Wadsak, W.; Winkler, D.; Hacker, M.; Rujescu, D.; Domschke, K.; Lanzenberger, R.; Spies, M.
Show abstract
Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, are understood as an intermediary between environmental factors affecting disease risk and pathophysiologic changes to brain structure and function. Cerebral monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) levels are altered in depression, as are DNA methylation levels within the MAOA gene, particularly in the promoter / exon I / intron I region. An effect of MAOA methylation on peripheral protein expression was shown, but the extent to which methylation affects brain MAO-A levels is not fully understood. Here, the influence of average and CpG site-specific MAOA promoter / exon I / intron I region DNA methylation on global MAO-A distribution volume (VT), an index of MAO-A density, was assessed via [11C]harmine positron emission tomography in 22 patients suffering from winter-type seasonal affective disorder and 30 healthy controls. No significant influence of MAOA DNA methylation on global MAO-A VT was found, despite correction for health status (patients vs. controls), sex, season (methylation analysis in spring / summer vs. fall / winter) and MAOA variable number of tandem repeat genotype (VNTR; high vs. low expression groups). However, in female subjects, season affected average DNA methylation, with higher levels in spring and summer (puncorr = 0.03). We thus did not find evidence for an effect of MAOA DNA methylation on brain MAO-A VT. In contrast to a previous study that demonstrated an effect of the methylation of a MAOA promoter region located further 5 on brain MAO-A, in the present study MAOA methylation appears to affect brain protein levels to a limited extent. The observed effect of season on methylation levels is in accordance with extensive evidence for seasonal effects within the serotonergic system. Clinicaltrials.gov IdentifierNCT02582398 EUDAMED NumberCIV-AT-13-01-009583
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 95%
- Neural Correlates of Positive and Negative Valence System Dysfunction in Adolescents Revealed by Data-Driven Parcellation and Resting-State Network Modeling 93%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal changes in brain metabolites in healthy subjects and patients with first episode psychosis (FEP): a 7-Tesla MRS study 94%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 93%
- Epigenome-wide association study of self-reported antidepressant use in Generation Scotland implicates the innate immune system 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased functional coupling of the mu opioid receptor in the anterior insula of depressed individuals 94%
- GABAA and NMDA receptor density alterations and their behavioral correlates in the gestational methylazoxymethanol acetate model for schizophrenia 93%
- Neurocognitive and Functional Heterogeneity in Depressed Youth 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of sex hormones on brain GABA and glutamate levels in a cis- and transgender cohort 92%
- The influence of sex steroid treatment on insular connectivity in gender dysphoria 91%
- Targeted bisulfite sequencing: A novel tool for the assessment of DNA methylation with high sensitivity and increased coverage 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.