Systematic literature review examining the mere-measurement effect of patient reported measures: the interaction of emotional valence and frequency of exposure as an independent factor in patient change
Long, P.; Huberts, A.; Rogge, A.; Otto, L.; Ritschl, V.; Koppert, L.; Stamm, T.
Show abstract
The use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) have become increasingly commonplace across many healthcare settings over the past two decades. The value of PROs is now acknowledged by healthcare providers and patients alike. However, to date, little is known about the best practices for formulating PRO measures (PROMS), but even more specifically, the effect had on the responding patients as a result of item word choice, emotional valence, or frequency of use. That is, 1) does the positive or negative wording of items affect the patients perspective on the latent variable, 2) is there a degree of subliminal influence or measurement effects on their behaviour resulting from exposure to PROs, and finally, 3) is such an effect amplified with repeated exposure?
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 94%
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 95%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 94%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 95%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 92%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 91%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorders: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression 90%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.