The Application of Data Science Techniques and Algorithms in Women Health Research
Akpan, I. J.; Aguolu, O. G.
Show abstract
ObjectiveEvaluate and map data science methods employed to solve health conditions of women, examine the problems tackled and the effectiveness. Research MethodText analytics, science mapping, and descriptive evaluation of data science methods utilized in women-related health research. Findings(i). The trends in scholarships using data science methods indicate gaps between women and men relating to health burden and access to health. (ii). The coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic tend to widen the identified health gaps, increasing the disease burden for women, while reducing access to health. There are noticeable additional health burdens on pregnant women and those with several health conditions (breast cancer, gynecologic oncology, cardiovascular disease, and more). (iii). Over 95% of studies using data science methods (artificial intelligence, machine learning, novel algorithms, predictive, big data, visual analytics, clinical decision support systems, or a combination of the methods) indicate significant effectiveness. (iv). Mapping of the scientific literature to authors, sources, and countries show an upward trend; 997 (16%), 113 (1.33%), and 57 (2.63%) per article, respectively. About 95% of research utilizing data science methods in womens health studies occurred within the last four (4) years. ConclusionsThe application of data science methods in tackling different health problems of women is effective and growing, and capable of easing the burden of health in women. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic tends to compound the health burden for women more than men. Policymakers must do more to improve access to health for women.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 95%
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 95%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Accessing Contraceptive Services among Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 93%
- Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen 93%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence and Evolution of Big Data Analytics in HIV Research: Bibliometric Analysis of Federally Sponsored Studies 2000-2019 93%
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 93%
- Predicting nutrition and environmental factors associated with female reproductive disorders using a knowledge graph and random forests 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating an Ignorance-Base: Exploring Known Unknowns in the Scientific Literature 92%
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 on the outreach strategy of cancer social service agencies in Singapore: A pre-post analysis with Facebook data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.