A screening tool enhances home-based identification of adolescents (aged 10-14) living with HIV in Zambia and South Africa: HPTN 071 (PopART) Study

IntroductionThe HPTN071 (PopART) for Youth (P-ART-Y) study evaluated the acceptability and uptake of a community-level combination HIV prevention package including universal testing and treatment (UTT) among young people in Zambia and South Africa (SA). We determined whether a four-question primary care level screening tool, validated for use in clinical settings, could enhance community (door-to-door) identification of undiagnosed HIV-positive younger adolescents (aged 10-14) who are frequently left out of HIV interventions. MethodCommunity HIV-care Providers (CHiPs) contacted and consented adolescents in their homes and offered them participation in the PopART intervention. CHiPs used a four question-screening tool, which included: history of hospital admission; recurring skin problems; poor health in last 3 months; and death of at least one parent. A "yes" response to one or more questions was classified as being "at risk" of being HIV-positive. The data were captured through an electronic data capturing device from August 2016 to December 2017. Proportions of adolescents who were deemed "at risk" were calculated and the association of screening "at risk" with age, sex and community was tested using a chi-squared test. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing the odds of testing HIV-positive if "at risk" with the odds of testing positive if "not at risk" was estimated using logistic regression. ResultsIn our 14 study sites, 33,283 adolescents aged 10-14 in Zambia and 8,610 in SA participated in the study. About 1.3% (427/33,710) and 1.2% (106/8,610) self-reported to be HIV positive. Excluding the self-reported HIV-positive, we classified 11.3% (3,746/33,283) of adolescents in Zambia and 17.5% (1,491/8,504) in SA as "at risk". In Zambia and SA, the "at risk" adolescents were 4.6 and nearly 16.7 times more likely to test HIV-positive compared to the "not at risk", respectively (both p<0.001). Using the screening tool, one-third of HIV-positive adolescents could be diagnosed using just a tenth of the number of HIV tests compared to universal testing. ConclusionThe screening tool may be of some value where UTT is not possible and limited resources must be prioritised toward adolescents who are more likely to be living with HIV. Further, the tool is of greater value in settings where there are more adolescents living with HIV who are undiagnosed. However, given our goal is to identify and treat all ALHIV, as well as link all HIV uninfected young people to prevention services, this screening tool should not be a substitute for UTT in community settings. Clinical Trial NumberNCT01900977