On-farm Implementation of Midseason Drainage to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Grain Arsenic Concentration in Rice Systems

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important staple crop throughout much of the world, however, it is also a significant source of agricultural methane (CH4) emissions and exposure to arsenic (As). Introduction of soil aerobic events through practices such as alternate wetting and drying or midseason drainage, in flooded rice systems can significantly decrease grain As concentration and seasonal CH4 emissions. Previous on small research plots research has shown that a single midseason drain accomplishes these goals without yield reduction, but the degree of benefit depends on soil-drying severity. A midseason drain also has the potential to fit in well within current management practices of California rice systems, however, it has not been tested across a wide range of soil types or at a scale that farmers typically manage in this region. Therefore, in this three-year study, we aimed to determine if the results from previous small plot research are similar to what can be expected on-farm. At seven on-farm trials we implemented a single midseason drain and compared the grain yields, GHG emissions, and As concentration to the traditional farmer practice (FP) practiced in an adjacent part of the field. Soil moisture parameters [perched water table, volumetric water content, gravimetric water content (GWC), and soil water potential], CH4 and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, grain As and cadmium concentration, and grain yield were quantified. Across site-years, midseason drainage reduced seasonal CH4 emissions by 20-77%, compared to the FP control with the magnitude of reduction related to the soil-drying severity. For every 1% reduction in soil GWC during the drainage period, CH4 emissions were reduced by approximately 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in previous on-station research using small plots. Midseason drainage increased N2O emissions (average = 0.248 kg N2O-N ha-1) compared to the control but this accounted for only 3% of the seasonal global warming potential across all drainage treatments. Drainage also decreased grain As concentration by approximately 20%, on average, but was not related to the degree of soil-drying. Importantly, midseason drainage had no significant impact on grain yields. Overall, these results confirm findings from previous on-station research, indicating that midseason drainage may be a viable on-farm management practice for GHG mitigation and for reducing grain As concentration in flooded rice fields with limited risk of yield reduction.