Back

Global, regional, and cryptic population structure in a high gene-flow transatlantic fish

Jansson, E.; Faust, E.; Bekkevold, D.; Quintela, M.; Durif, C.; Halvorsen, K. T.; Dahle, G.; Pampoulie, C. S.; Kennedy, J.; Whittaker, B.; Unneland, L.; Andre, C.; Glover, K. A.

2022-03-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.03.22.485384 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) is a transatlantic marine fish displaying large population sizes and a high potential for dispersal and gene-flow. These features are expected to result in weak population structure. Here, we investigated population genetic structure of lumpfish throughout its natural distribution in the North Atlantic using two approaches: I) 4393 genome wide SNPs and 95 individuals from 10 locations, and II) 139 discriminatory SNPs and 1,669 individuals from 40 locations. Both approaches identified extensive population genetic structuring with a major split between the East and West Atlantic and a distinct Baltic Sea population, as well as further differentiation of lumpfish from the English Channel, Iceland, and Greenland. The targeted discriminatory loci displayed [~]2-5 times higher divergence than the genome wide approach, revealing further evidence of local population substructures. Lumpfish from Isfjorden in Svalbard were highly distinct but resembled most fish from Greenland. The Kattegat area in the Baltic transition zone, formed a previously undescribed distinct genetic group. Also, further subdivision was detected within North America, Iceland, West Greenland, Barents Sea, and Norway. Although lumpfish have considerable potential for dispersal and gene-flow, the observed high levels of population structuring throughout the Atlantic suggests that this species displays natal homing and potentially local populations with adaptive differences. This fine-scale population structure calls for consideration when defining management units for lumpfish fishing stocks and in decisions related to sourcing and moving lumpfish for farming and cleaner fish use.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.7%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.0%
3
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
12
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%