Exploring patient experiences and concerns in the online Cochlear Implant community: a natural language processing approach
Williams, C. Y. K.; Li, R. X.; Luo, M. Y.; Bance, M.
Show abstract
ImportanceThere is a paucity of research examining patient experiences of cochlear implants, with existing studies limited by small sample sizes and closed question-answer style formats. ObjectiveTo use natural language processing methods to explore patient experiences and concerns in the online cochlear implant (CI) community when in conversation with each other. DesignCross-sectional study of the online Reddit r/CochlearImplants forum. No date restrictions were imposed; data were retrieved on 11 November 2021 and analysed between November 2021 and March 2022. The following details were extracted for each post: 1) original post content, 2) post comments, and 3) metadata for the original post and user. SettingOnline Reddit forum r/CochlearImplants. ParticipantsConsecutive sample of all users posting on the r/CochlearImplants forum from 1 March 2015 to 11 November 2021. Main Outcomes and MeasuresNatural language processing using the BERTopic automated topic modelling technique was employed to cluster posts into semantically similar topics. Topic categorisation was manually validated by two independent reviewers and Cohens Kappa calculated to determine inter-rater reliability between machine vs human and human vs human categorisation. ResultsWe retrieved 987 posts from 588 unique Reddit users on the r/CochlearImplants forum. Posts were initially categorised by BERTopic into 16 different Topics, which were increased to 22 Topics following manual inspection. The most popular topics related to CI connectivity (n = 112), adults considering getting a CI (n=107), surgery-related posts (n = 89) and day-to-day living with a CI (n = 85). Topics with the most comments included Choosing cochlear implant brand (mean = 12.9 comments) and Adults considering getting a CI (mean = 12.2 comments). Cohens kappa among all posts was 0.62 (machine vs human) and 0.72 (human vs human), and among categorised posts was 0.85 (machine vs human) and 0.84 (human vs human). Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of social media discussions amongst the online cochlear implant community identified common attitudes, experiences and concerns of patients living with, or seeking, a cochlear implant. Our validation of natural language processing methods to categorise topics shows that automated analysis of similar Otolaryngology-related content is a viable and accurate alternative to manual qualitative approaches. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the main patient experiences and concerns reported by the online cochlear implant (CI) community? FindingsIn this cross-sectional study of 987 posts from the Reddit forum r/CochlearImplants, we employed and validated a natural language processing approach to identify a variety of common themes discussed by current and prospective CI users. These ranged from CI connectivity and day-to-day living with a CI to queries about choosing a CI brand and post-op expectations. MeaningAnalysis of social media using automated topic modelling techniques is a viable and insightful method to explore CI user experiences.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of bimodal neuromodulation for tinnitus treatment in a real-world clinical setting in United States: A retrospective chart review 93%
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges 90%
- Prospective validation of smartphone-based heart rate and respiratory rate measurement algorithms 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 92%
- Applicability of a short form of the Speech, Spatial und Qualities of Hearing Scale in 97 individuals with Meniere's disease in a multicentric registry 89%
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users 94%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 91%
- Predicting Depression from Hearing Loss Using Machine Learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Identification of Tinnitus Malingering Based on Overt and Covert Behavioral Responses During Psychoacoustic Testing 91%
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 89%
- A Deep Learning Based Smartphone Application for Early Detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Endoscopic Images 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital thErapy For Improved tiNnitus carE Study (DEFINE): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 91%
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.