Complete chloroplast genomes and phylogeny in three Euterpe palms (E. edulis, E. oleraceae and E. precatoria) from different Brazilian biomes
Francisconi, A. F.; dos Santos, L. A. C.; Morales Marroquin, J. A.; van den Berg, C.; Alves-Pereira, A.; Delmondes de Alencar, L.; Picanco-Rodrigues, D.; Zanello, C. A.; Ferreira Costa, M.; Gomes Lopes, M. T.; Veasey, E. A.; Zucchi, M. I.
Show abstract
The Brazilian palm fruits and hearts-of-palm of Euterpe edulis, E. oleracea and E. precatoria are an important source for agro-industrial production, but overexploitation requires conservation strategies to maintain genetic diversity. Chloroplast genomes have conserved sequences, which are useful to explore evolutionary questions. Besides the plastid DNA, genome skimming allows the identification of other genomic resources, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), providing information about the genetic diversity of species. We sequenced the chloroplast genome and identified gene content in the three Euterpe species. We performed comparative analyses, described the polymorphisms among the chloroplast genome sequences (repeats, indels and SNPs) and performed a phylogenomic inference based on 55 palm species chloroplast genomes. Finally, using the remaining data from genome skimming, the nuclear and mitochondrial reads, we identified SNPs and estimated the genetic diversity among these Euterpe species. The Euterpe chloroplast genomes varied from 159,232 to 159,275 bp and presented a conserved quadripartite structure with high synteny with other palms. In a pairwise comparison, we found a greater number of insertions/deletions (indels = 93 and 103) and SNPs (284 and 254) between E. edulis/E. oleracea and E. edulis/E. precatoria when compared to E. oleracea/E. precatoria (58 indels and 114 SNPs). Also, the phylogeny indicated a closer relationship between E. oleracea/E. precatoria. The nuclear and mitochondrial genome analyses identified 1,077 SNPs and high divergence among species (FST = 0.77), especially between E. edulis and E. precatoria (FST = 0.86). These results showed that, despite the few structural differences among the chloroplast genomes of these Euterpe palms, a differentiation between E. edulis and the other Euterpe species can be identified by point mutations. This study not only brings new knowledge about the evolution of Euterpe chloroplast genomes, but also these new resources open the way for future phylogenomic inferences and comparative analyses within Arecaceae.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of three Macadamia species (M. integrifolia, M. ternifolia and M. tetraphylla) 97%
- Genetic variations associated with adaptation processes in Acrocomia palms: A comparative study across the Neotropic for future crop improvement 96%
- Complete Chloroplast Genome of Castanopsis sclerophylla (Lindl.) Schott: Genome Structures, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison among the first representative chloroplast genomes of Orontium, Lasia, Zamioculcas, and Stylochaeton of the plant family Araceae: inverted repeat dynamics are not linked to phylogenetic signaling 99%
- Plastomes of Garcinia mangostana L. and comparative analysis with other Garcinia species 95%
- Transcriptome sequence reveals candidate genes involving in the post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome sequencing of Syzygium cumini (Jamun) reveals adaptive evolution in secondary metabolism pathways associated with its medicinal properties 97%
- Molecular characterization revealed the role of thaumatin-like proteins in stress response in bread wheat 95%
- A chromosome-level genome assembly of Solanum chilense, a tomato wild relative associated with resistance to salinity and drought 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.