Directional anchor genes refine polygenic informed treatment selection in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Reay, W. R.; Geaghan, M. P.; Atkins, J. R.; Carr, V. J.; Green, M. J.; Cairns, M. J.
Show abstract
Genetically informed drug development and repurposing is an attractive prospect for improving outcomes in patients with psychiatric illness; however, the effectiveness of these endeavours can be confounded by heterogeneity. In this study, we propose a novel approach that links interventions implicated by disorder-associated genetic risk, at the population level, to a framework that can target these compounds to individuals. Specifically, results from genome-wide association studies are integrated with expression data to prioritise individual "directional anchor" genes for which the predicted risk-increasing direction of expression could be counteracted by an existing drug. While these compounds represent plausible therapeutic candidates, they are not likely to be equally efficacious for all individuals. To account for this heterogeneity, we constructed polygenic scores restricted to variants annotated to the network of genes that interact with each directional anchor gene. These metrics, we call pharmagenic enrichment scores (PES), identify individuals with a higher burden of genetic risk, localised in biological processes related to the candidate drug target, to inform precision drug repurposing. We used this approach to investigate schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and reveal several compounds targeting specific directional anchor genes that could be plausibly repurposed, including antioxidants, vitamins, antiarrhythmics, and lipid modifying agents. These genetic risk scores, mapped to the networks associated with target genes, revealed biological insights that cannot be observed in undifferentiated genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS). For example, an enrichment of these partitioned scores in schizophrenia cases with otherwise low PRS and distinct correlations with measured biochemical traits. In summary, genetic risk could be used more specifically to direct drug repurposing candidates that target particular genes implicated in psychiatric and other complex disorders.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 96%
- Genetic Analysis of Psychosis Biotypes: Shared Ancestry-Adjusted Polygenic Risk and Unique Genomic Associations 95%
- Inflammation and cognition in severe mental illness: Patterns of covariation and subgroups 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 95%
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 94%
- Convergent and distributed effects of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 deletion on the human neural transcriptome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Schizophrenia Risk Alleles Often Affect The Expression of Many Genes and Each Gene May Have a Different Effect On The Risk; A Mediation Analysis. 95%
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals extensive genetic overlap between mood instability and psychiatric disorders but divergent patterns of genetic effects 95%
- Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: from disorder-specific to transdiagnostic perspectives 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 94%
- Evidence of shared genetic influences underlying schizophrenia and alcohol use disorder, but not alcohol consumption 94%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.