Back

Case-only rare variant analysis of severe alcohol dependence (AD) using a multivariate hierarchical gene clustering approach.

Gentry, A. E.; Alexander, J.; Peterson, R. E.; Bacanu, S.-A.; Riley, B. P.; Webb, B. T.

2022-03-18 genetics
10.1101/2022.03.16.484608 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVariation in genes involved in ethanol metabolism has been shown to influence risk for alcohol dependence (AD) including protective loss of function alleles in ethanol metabolizing genes. We therefore hypothesized that people with severe AD would exhibit different patterns of rare functional variation in genes with strong prior evidence for influencing ethanol metabolism and response when compared to genes not meeting these criteria. ObjectiveLeverage a novel case only design and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) of severe AD cases from the island of Ireland to quantify differences in functional variation between genes associated with ethanol metabolism and/or response and their matched control genes. MethodsFirst, three sets of ethanol related genes were identified including those a) involved in alcohol metabolism in humans b) showing altered expression in mouse brain after alcohol exposure, and altering ethanol behavioral responses in invertebrate models. These genes of interest (GOI) sets were matched to control gene sets using multivariate hierarchical clustering of gene-level summary features from gnomAD. Using WES data from 190 individuals with severe AD, GOI were compared to matched control genes using logistic regression to detect aggregate differences in abundance of loss of function, missense, and synonymous variants, respectively. ResultsThree non-independent sets of 10, 117, and 359 genes were queried against control gene sets of 139, 1522, and 3360 matched genes, respectively. Significant differences were not detected in the number of functional variants in the primary set of ethanol-metabolizing genes. In both the mouse expression and invertebrate sets, we observed an increased number of synonymous variants in GOI over matched control genes. Post-hoc simulations showed the estimated effects sizes observed are unlikely to be under-estimated. ConclusionThe proposed method demonstrates a computationally viable and statistically appropriate approach for genetic analysis of case-only data for hypothesized gene sets supported by empirical evidence.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.3%
3
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
10
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%