EsMeCaTa: Estimating metabolic capabilities from taxonomic affiliations
Belcour, A.; Ruiz, B.; Frioux, C.; Blanquart, S.; Siegel, A.
Show abstract
PurposeMetabarcoding, and metagenomic sequencing have enabled the characterization of highly diverse environmental communities. The challenge of estimating the metabolic functions carried out by these communities has led to the development of several state-of-the-art methods, most of which are tailored to a specific gene marker. However, the increasing diversity of approaches resulting from advances in sequencing technologies drives the need for methods capable of handling heterogeneous microbial community data. Moreover, predictions often depend on their internal analysis pipelines and are influenced by the underlying databases, which link marker genes to specific functional annotations. This limits users ability to evaluate the quality of predictions by tracing internal data and processes. Finally, users are constrained by the specific annotations provided by these methods (e.g. EC numbers), limiting their ability to conduct further specialized analyses based on intermediate results. MethodsEsMeCaTa predicts consensus proteomes and their associated functions from taxonomic affiliations. A key feature of EsMeCaTa is its explainability and flexibility. To support the flexible integration of heterogeneous sequencing data, EsMeCaTa utilizes taxonomic affiliations obtained through analyses of diverse sequencing datasets. To provide insight into the knowledge available for each taxonomic affliation and to interpret the relevance of predicted functions, EsMeCaTa identifies a taxonomic rank within a given affliation that is suffciently represented by documented proteomes in the UniProt database. The proteins of the UniProt proteomes are clustered and filtered according to a threshold to create consensus proteomes. These consensus proteomes are automatically annotated with functional information (e.g., EC numbers, GO terms) but they are also designed to be used in further customized annotation workflows. Functional annotations are reported in a functional table, which can be enriched with taxon abundances to generate comprehensive functional profiles. ResultsEsMeCaTa predictions have been validated using multiple datasets and compared to a state-of-the-art method. Additionally, it was applied to a novel metabarcoding dataset from a methanogenic reactor, characterizing the microbial community and biogas production across different time points and intake condition. Our results demonstrate the link between biogas production, intake condition and the dynamics of the metabolic functions predicted by EsMeCaTa in the microbial communities.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiomes attached to fresh perennial ryegrass- are temporally resilient and adapt to changing ecological niches 95%
- PathoFact: A pipeline for the prediction of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes in metagenomic data 94%
- Understanding the host-microbe interactions using metabolic modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gempipe: a tool for drafting, curating and analyzing pan and multi-strain genome-scale metabolic models. 96%
- Addressing the dynamic nature of reference data: a new nt database for robust metagenomic classification 95%
- GSR-DB: a manually curated and optimised taxonomical database for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PathoGFAIR: a collection of FAIR and adaptable (meta)genomics workflows for (foodborne) pathogens detection and tracking 95%
- dadasnake, a Snakemake implementation of DADA2 to process amplicon sequencing data for microbial ecology 95%
- Global ocean resistome revealed: exploring Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) abundance and distribution on TARA oceans samples through machine learning tools 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.