Patient-reported respiratory outcome measures in the recovery of adults hospitalised with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Middleton, S.; Chalitsios, C.; McKeever, T.; Jenkins, A.; Bolton, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcute COVID-19 clinical symptoms have been clearly documented, but long-term functional and symptomatic recovery from COVID -19 is less well described. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to describe patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults at least 8 weeks post hospital discharge for COVID-19. Comprehensive database searches in accordance with the PRISMA statement were carried out up till 31/05/2021. Data were narratively synthesized, and a series of meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects inverse variance method. ResultsFrom 49 studies, across 14 countries with between 2-12 months follow up, the most common persisting symptom reported was fatigue with meta-analysis finding 36.6% (95 % CI 27.6 to 46.6, n=14) reporting it at 2-4 months, decreasing slightly to 32.5% still reporting it at >4 months (95% CI 22.6 to 44.2, n=15). This was followed by dyspnoea. Modified MRC score (mMRC) [≥]1 was reported in 48% (95% CI 30 to 37, n=5) at 2-4months reducing to 32% (95% CI 22 to 43, n=7) at 4 months. Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L VAS remained reduced at >4 months (73.6 95% CI 68.1 to 79.1, n=6). Hospitalisation with COVID-19 also resulted in persisting sick leave, change in scope of work, and continued use of primary and secondary healthcare. ConclusionThe symptomatic and functional impact of COVID-19 continues to be felt by patients months after discharge from hospital. This widespread morbidity points towards a multi-disciplinary approach to aid functional recovery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: a systematic review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychometric analysis of the modified Covid-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) in a prospective multicentre study 93%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 93%
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 94%
- Reduction in COPD exacerbations during COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- One year health outcomes associated with systemic corticosteroids for COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study 93%
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 93%
- Limited recovery from post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) at eight months in a prospective cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-Term Acceptability of Hygiene, Face Covering, and Social Distancing Interventions to Prevent Exacerbations in people living with Airways Diseases 91%
- Adrenaline (epinephrine) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- Brain activity measured by functional brain imaging predicts breathlessness improvement during pulmonary rehabilitation 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.