Health service research definition builder: An R Shiny application for exploring diagnosis codes associated with services reported in routinely collected health data
Chalmers, K.; Gopinath, V.; Elshaug, A. G.
Show abstract
Many administrative health data-based studies define patient cohorts using procedure and diagnosis codes. The impact these criteria have on a studys final cohort is not always transparent to co-investigators or other audiences if access to the research data is restricted. We developed a SAS and R Shiny interactive research support tool which generates and displays the diagnosis code summaries associated with a selected medical service or procedure. This allows non-analyst users to interrogate claims data and groupings of reported diagnosis codes. The SAS program uses a tree classifier to find associated diagnosis codes with the service claims compared against a matched, random sample of claims without the service. Claims are grouped based on the overlap of these associated diagnosis codes. The Health Services Research (HSR) Definition Builder Shiny application uses this input to create interactive table and graphics, which updates estimated claim counts of the selected service as users select inclusion and exclusion criteria. This tool can help researchers develop preliminary and shareable definitions for cohorts for administrative health data research. It allows an additional validation step of examining frequency of all diagnosis codes associated with a service, reducing the risk of incorrect included or omitted codes from the final definition. In our results, we explore use of the application on three example services in 2016 US Medicare claims for patients aged over 65: knee arthroscopy, spinal fusion procedures and urinalysis. Readers can access the application at https://kelsey209.shinyapps.io/hsrdefbuilder/ and the code at https://github.com/kelsey209/hsrdefbuilder.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 94%
- CohortDiagnostics: phenotype evaluation across a network of observational data sources using population-level characterization 93%
- Association of Mortality and Aspirin Prescription for COVID-19 Patients at the Veterans Health Administration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 94%
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 92%
- Increasing Trust in Real-World Evidence Through Evaluation of Observational Data Quality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardizing Phenotypic Algorithms for the Classification of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tear from Electronic Health Record Systems 93%
- Development and Application of Pharmacological Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms Phenotyping Algorithms Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records Data 93%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 92%
- Electronic prescribing systems as tools to improve patient care: a learning health systems approach to increase guideline concordant prescribing for venous thromboembolism prevention 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Directed Interventions Associate with Decreased Hospitalization Rates in Hemodialysis Patients 93%
- LinkR: an open source, low-code and collaborative data science platform for healthcare data analysis and visualization 92%
- Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.