Time-Varying Risk of Death After SARS-CoV-2-Infection in Long-Term Care Facility Residents: A Matched Cohort Study
Ballin, M.; Ioannidis, J. P. A.; Bergman, J.; Kivipelto, M.; Nordström, A.; Nordström, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 confers high risk of short-term death in residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities, but longer-term risk among survivors is unclear. MethodsWe extended the follow-up period of a previous, propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study based on the Swedish Senior Alert register. N=3731 LTC residents with documented SARS-CoV-2 until 15 September 2020 were matched to 3731 uninfected controls using time-dependent propensity scores on age, sex, health status, comorbidities, and prescription medications. In a sensitivity analysis, matching included also geographical region and Senior Alert registration time. The outcome was all-cause mortality over 8 months (until October 24, 2020). The absolute risk of death was examined using Kaplan-Meier plots. Hazard ratios (HR) for death over time were estimated using flexible parametric models with restricted cubic splines. Cox regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in 30-day intervals of follow-up until 210 days. ResultsThe median age was 87 years and 65% were women. Excess mortality was highest 5 days after documented infection (HR 19.1, 95% CI, 14.6-24.8), after which excess mortality decreased. From the second month onwards, mortality rate became lower in infected residents than controls. The HR for death during days 61-210 of follow-up was 0.41 in the main analysis (95% CI, 0.34-0.50) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.93) in the sensitivity analysis. Median survival of uninfected controls was 1.6 years, which was much lower than the national life expectancy in Sweden at age 87 (5.05 years in men, 6.07 years in women). ConclusionsNo excess mortality was observed in LTC residents who survived the acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Life expectancy of uninfected residents was much lower than that of the general population of the same age and sex. This suggests that LTC resident status should be accounted for in years-of-life-lost estimates for COVID-19 burden of disease calculations. Impact statementWe certify that this work is novel. This research adds to the literature by showing there was no excess mortality observed in long-term care facility residents who survived the acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and that life expectancy of uninfected residents was much lower than that of the general population of same age and sex. This has major repercussions for estimation of years of life lost in infected long term care facility residents. Key pointsO_LISARS-CoV-2 infection sharply increased mortality risk among residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities in the first month. C_LIO_LIAfter the first month, the mortality risk in infected residents rapidly returned to baseline and dropped below the mortality risk of uninfected controls, where it remained lower for 8 months of follow-up. C_LIO_LIMedian survival of uninfected controls was 1.6 years, which was much lower than national life expectancy in Sweden at age 87. C_LI Why does this matter?O_LIWhereas LTC residents who recover from SARS-CoV-2 infection may be concerned about having residual debilitation caused by the infection, we found no excess mortality was in those who survived the acute infection. C_LIO_LIBecause life expectancy of uninfected residents was much lower than that of the general population of same age and sex, LTC resident status should be accounted for in estimations of years of life lost. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Care-Home Mortality and Life Expectancy in Scotland 95%
- COVID-19 infection and attributable mortality in UK care homes: Cohort study using active surveillance and electronic records (March-June 2020) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Suspicion of COVID-19 in Nursing Home residents: symptoms and mortality risk factors 95%
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 94%
- Frailty and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19: retrospective observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 mortality: prospective cohort study 93%
- Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview 92%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rehabilitation needs and mortality associated with the Covid-19 pandemic: a population-based study of all hospitalised and home-healthcare individuals in a Swedish healthcare region 93%
- Centenarians and extremely old people living with frailty can elicit durable SARS-CoV-2 spike specific IgG antibodies with virus neutralization functions following virus infection 93%
- Serious hospital events following symptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants: an exposed-unexposed cohort study in December 2021 from the COVID-19 surveillance databases in France 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations: A general population cohort study of 1.3 million 94%
- The Role of Frailty in Shaping Social Contact Patterns in Belgium, 2022-2023 93%
- Cross-classification between self-rated health and health status: longitudinal analyses of all-cause mortality and leading causes of death in the UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.