Back

Interstitial lung damage following COVID-19 hospitalisation: an interim analysis of the UKILD Post-COVID study.

Stewart, I.; Jacob, J.; Gerorge, P.; Molyneax, P.; Porter, J.; Allen, R.; Baillie, J.; Barratt, S.; Beirne, P.; Bianchi, S.; Blaikley, J.; Chalmers, J.; Chambers, R.; Chadhuri, N.; Coleman, C.; Collier, G.; Denneny, E.; Docherty, A.; Elneima, O.; Evans, R.; Fabbri, L.; Gibbons, M.; Gleeson, F.; Gooptu, B.; Greening, N.; Guillen Guio, B.; Hall, I.; Hanley, N.; Harris, V.; Harrison, E.; Heightman, M.; Hillman, T.; Horsley, A.; Houchen-Wolloff, L.; Jarrold, I.; Johnson, S.; Jones, M.; Khan, F.; Lawson, R.; Leavy, O.; Lone, N.; Marks, M.; McAuley, H.; Mehta, P.; Omer, E.; Parekh, D.; Parmar, A.; P

2022-03-12 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.03.10.22272081 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionShared characteristics between COVID-19 and pulmonary fibrosis, including symptoms, genetic architecture, and circulating biomarkers, suggests interstitial lung disease (ILD) development may be associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsThe UKILD Post-COVID study planned interim analysis was designed to stratify risk groups and estimate the prevalence of Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Damage (ILDam) using the Post-HOSPitalisation COVID-19 (PHOSP-COVID) Study. Demographics, radiological patterns and missing data were assessed descriptively. Bayes binomial regression was used to estimate the risk ratio of persistent lung damage >10% involvement in linked, clinically indicated CT scans. Indexing thresholds of percent predicted DLco, chest X-ray findings and severity of admission were used to generate risk strata. Number of cases within strata were used to estimate the amount of suspected Post-COVID ILDam. ResultsA total 3702 people were included in the UKILD interim cohort, 2406 completed an early follow-up research visit within 240 days of discharge and 1296 had follow-up through routine clinical review. We linked the cohort to 87 clinically indicated CTs with visually scored radiological patterns (median 119 days from discharge; interquartile range 83 to 155, max 240), of which 74 people had ILDam. ILDam was associated with abnormal chest X-ray (RR 1.21 95%CrI 1.05; 1.40), percent predicted DLco<80% (RR 1.25 95%CrI 1.00; 1.56) and severe admission (RR 1.27 95%CrI 1.07; 1.55). A risk index based on these features suggested 6.9% of the interim cohort had moderate to very-high risk of Post-COVID ILDam. Comparable radiological patterns were observed in repeat scans >90 days in a subset of participants. ConclusionThese interim data highlight that ILDam was not uncommon in clinically indicated thoracic CT up to 8 months following SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation. Whether the ILDam will progress to ILD is currently unknown, however health services should radiologically and physiologically monitor individuals who have Post-COVID ILDam risk factors.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.