Process evaluation protocol for the SLEEP study: a hybrid digital CBT-I intervention for working people with insomnia
Hurley-Wallace, A. L.; Moukhtarian, T.; Patel, K.; Toro, C.; Russel, S.; Daly, G.; Walasek, L.; Tang, N. K. Y.; Meyer, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Supporting Employees with Insomnia and Emotional Regulation Problems (SLEEP) pilot uses hybrid digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) to help working people address their sleep and emotion regulation problems, using cognitive, behavioural, and psychoeducation techniques. A process evaluation within this trial will improve our understanding of how the intervention brought about change, including identifying barriers and facilitators to engagement and subsequent change, and the extent to which contextual factors played a role. Methods and analysisThis qualitative process evaluation will use semi-structured interviews, conducted via online videoconferencing, to explore participant experiences of the SLEEP intervention. Twenty-five participants who completed the SLEEP intervention (16 %) will be randomly sampled. Interviews will be analysed using a thematic and framework analytic approach. A codebook style thematic analysis will be used, and a framework focusing on the research questions will be applied to the codebook. The final report will present themes generated, alongside the finalised codebook. The report resulting from this research will adhere to CORE-Q quality guidelines. Ethics and disseminationFull approval for the SLEEP study was given by the University of Warwick Biomedical and Research Ethics Committee (BSREC 45/20-21). All data collection adheres to data collection guidelines. Participants provided written informed consent for the main trial, and all interviewees provided additional written and verbal (audio-recorded) consent. The results of the process evaluation will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. A lay report will be provided to all participants. Trial registrationISRCTN13596153; Pre-results.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the effectiveness of mindfulness alone compared to exercise and mindfulness on fatigue in women with gynaecology cancer (GEMS): Protocol for a randomised feasibility trial 95%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 89%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 89%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 93%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
- Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.