Back

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Infection of Individuals with High Titer Neutralizing Antibodies Post-3rd mRNA Vaccine Dose

Roeder, A. J.; Koehler, M. A.; Svarovsky, S.; Jasbi, P.; Seit-Nebi, A.; Gonzalez-Moa, M. J.; Vanderhoof, J.; Mckechnie, D.; Edwards, B. A.; Lake, D. F.

2022-03-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.03.03.22270812 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines prevent hospitalization and severe disease caused by wildtype SARS-CoV-2 and several variants, and likely prevented infection when serum neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers were >1:160. Preventing infection limits viral replication resulting in mutation, which can lead to the emergence of additional variants. MethodsDuring a longitudinal study to evaluate durability of a three-dose mRNA vaccine regimen (2 primary doses and a booster) using a rapid test that semi-quantitatively measures NAbs, the Omicron variant emerged and quickly spread globally. We evaluated NAb levels measured prior to symptomatic breakthrough infection, in groups infected prior to and after the emergence of Omicron. ResultsDuring the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant wave, 93% of breakthrough infections in our study occurred when serum NAb titers were <1:80. In contrast, after the emergence of Omicron, study participants with high NAb titers that had received booster vaccine doses became symptomatically infected. NAb titers prior to infection were [&ge;]1:640 in 64% of the Omicron-infected population, [&ge;]1:320 (14%), and [&ge;]1:160 (21%). DiscussionThese results indicate that high titers of NAbs elicited by currently available mRNA vaccines do not protect against infection with the Omicron variant, and that mild to moderate symptomatic infections did occur in a vaccinated and boosted population, although did not require hospitalization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
9
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%