Back

Baricitinib in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial and updated meta-analysis

Horby, P. W.; Emberson, J. R.; Mafham, M.; Campbell, M.; Peto, L.; Pessoa-Amorim, G.; Spata, E.; Staplin, N.; Lowe, C.; Chadwick, D. R.; Brightling, C.; Stewart, R.; Collini, P.; Ashish, A.; Green, C. A.; Prudon, B.; Felton, T.; Kerry, A.; Baillie, J. K.; Buch, M. H.; Day, J. N.; Faust, S. N.; Jaki, T.; Jeffery, K.; Juszczak, E.; Knight, M.; Lim, W. S.; Montgomery, A.; Mumford, A.; Rowan, K.; Thwaites, G.; Haynes, R.; Landray, M. J.

2022-03-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.03.02.22271623 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe evaluated the use of baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital because of COVID-19. MethodsThis randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing multiple possible treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual standard of care alone (usual care group) or usual care plus baricitinib 4 mg once daily by mouth for 10 days or until discharge if sooner (baricitinib group). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A meta-analysis was conducted that included the results from the RECOVERY trial and all previous randomised controlled trials of baricitinib or other JAK inhibitor in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The RECOVERY trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04381936). FindingsBetween 2 February 2021 and 29 December 2021, 8156 patients were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus baricitinib versus usual care alone. At randomisation, 95% of patients were receiving corticosteroids and 23% receiving tocilizumab (with planned use within the next 24 hours recorded for a further 9%). Overall, 513 (12%) of 4148 patients allocated to baricitinib versus 546 (14%) of 4008 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (age-adjusted rate ratio 0{middle dot}87; 95% CI 0{middle dot}77-0{middle dot}98; p=0{middle dot}026). This 13% proportional reduction in mortality was somewhat smaller than that seen in a meta-analysis of 8 previous trials of a JAK inhibitor (involving 3732 patients and 425 deaths) in which allocation to a JAK inhibitor was associated with a 43% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.45-0.72). Including the results from RECOVERY into an updated meta-analysis of all 9 completed trials (involving 11,888 randomised patients and 1484 deaths) allocation to baricitinib or other JAK inhibitor was associated with a 20% proportional reduction in mortality (rate ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89; p<0.001). In RECOVERY, there was no significant excess in death or infection due to non-COVID-19 causes and no excess of thrombosis, or other safety outcomes. InterpretationIn patients hospitalised for COVID-19, baricitinib significantly reduced the risk of death but the size of benefit was somewhat smaller than that suggested by previous trials. The total randomised evidence to date suggests that JAK inhibitors (chiefly baricitinib) reduce mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 by about one-fifth. FundingUK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research (Grant ref: MC_PC_19056).

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
4
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
19
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%