Back

Hidden diversity - DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities

Gleason, J. E.; Hanner, R. H.; Cottenie, K.

2022-03-02 ecology
10.1101/2022.02.28.481642 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Freshwater ecosystems, such as streams, are facing increasing pressures from agricultural land use. Aquatic insects and other macroinvertebrates have historically been used as indicators of ecological condition and water quality in freshwater biomonitoring programs; however, many of these protocols use coarse taxonomic resolution (e.g., family) when identifying macroinvertebrates. The use of family-level identification can mask species-level diversity, as well as patterns in community composition in response to environmental variables. Recent literature stresses the importance of robust biomonitoring to detect trends in insect decline globally, though most of these studies are carried out in terrestrial habitats. Here, we incorporate molecular identification (DNA metabarcoding) into a stream biomonitoring sampling design to explore the diversity and variability of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities at small spatial scales. We sampled twenty southern Ontario streams in an agricultural landscape for aquatic macroinvertebrates and, using DNA metabarcoding, revealed incredibly rich benthic communities which were largely comprised of rare taxa detected only once per stream despite multiple biological replicates. In addition to numerous rare taxa, our species pool estimates indicated that after 240 samples from twenty streams, there was a large proportion of taxa present which remained undetected by our sampling regime. When comparing different levels of taxonomic resolution, we observed that using OTUs revealed over ten times more taxa than family-level identification. A single insect family, the Chironomidae, contained over one third of the total number of OTUs detected in our study. Within-stream dissimilarity estimates were consistently high for all taxonomic groups (invertebrate families, invertebrate OTUs, chironomid OTUs), indicating stream communities are very dissimilar at small spatial scales. While we predicted that increased land use would homogenize benthic communities, this was not supported as within-stream dissimilarity was unrelated to land use.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
13
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
14
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
18
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
23
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%