AI based pre-screening of large bowel cancer via weakly supervised learning of colorectal biopsy histology images
Bilal, M.; Tsang, Y. W.; Ali, M.; Graham, S.; Hero, E.; Wahab, N.; Dodd, K.; Sahota, H.; Lu, W.; Jahanifar, M.; Robinson, A.; Azam, A.; Benes, K.; Nimir, M.; Bhalerao, A.; Eldaly, H.; Raza, S. E. A.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Minhas, F.; Snead, D.; Rajpoot, N.
Show abstract
Histopathological examination is a pivotal step in the diagnosis and treatment planning of many major diseases. To facilitate the diagnostic decision-making and reduce the workload of pathologists, we present an AI-based pre-screening tool capable of identifying normal and neoplastic colon biopsies. To learn the differential histological patterns from whole slides images (WSIs) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), our proposed weakly supervised deep learning method requires only slide-level labels and no detailed cell or region-level annotations. The proposed method was developed and validated on an internal cohort of biopsy slides (n=4 292) from two hospitals labeled with corresponding diagnostic categories assigned by pathologists after reviewing case reports. Performance of the proposed colon cancer pre-screening tool was evaluated in a cross-validation setting using the internal cohort (n=4 292) and also by an external validation on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n=731). With overall cross-validated classification accuracy (AUROC = 0.9895) and external validation accuracy (AUROC = 0.9746), the proposed tool promises high accuracy to assist with the pre-screening of colorectal biopsies in clinical practice. Analysis of saliency maps confirms the representation of disease heterogeneity in model predictions and their association with relevant pathological features. The proposed AI tool correctly reported some slides as neoplastic while clinical reports suggested they were normal. Additionally, we analyzed genetic mutations and gene enrichment analysis of AI-generated neoplastic scores to gain further insight into the model predictions and explore the association between neoplastic histology and genetic heterogeneity through representative genes and signaling pathways.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attention-based whole-slide image compression achieves pathologist-level pre-screening of multi-organ routine histopathology biopsies 98%
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 95%
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using an Anomaly Detection Approach for the Segmentation of Colorectal Cancer Tumors in Whole Slide Images 97%
- Bladder Cancer Prognosis Using Deep Neural Networks and Histopathology Images 96%
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer 95%
- Machine learning enables detection of early-stage colorectal cancer by whole-genome sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA 93%
- Deep learning-based tumor microenvironment segmentation is predictive of tumor mutations and patient survival in non-small-cell lung cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning 98%
- Computer Vision Identifies Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma in situ Lesions with Special Emphasis on African American Women 93%
- Deep learning driven quantification of interstitial fibrosis in kidney biopsies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.