Regulatory strategies to schedule threshold crossing of protein levels at a prescribed time
Nieto, C.; Ghusinga, K. R.; Singh, A.
Show abstract
The timing of diverse cellular processes is based on the instant when the concentration of regulatory proteins crosses a critical threshold level. Hence, noise mechanisms inherent to these protein synthesis pathways drive statistical fluctuations in such events timing. How to express proteins ensuring both the threshold crossing at a prescribed time and minimal timing fluctuations? To find this optimal strategy, we formulate a model where protein molecules are synthesized in random bursts of gene activity. The burst frequency depends on the protein level creating a feedback loop, and cellular growth dilutes protein concentration between consecutive bursts. Counterintuitively, our analysis shows that positive feedback in protein production is best for minimizing variability in threshold-crossing times. We analytically predict the optimal feedback strength in terms of the dilution rate. As a corollary to our result, a no-feedback strategy emerges as the optimal strategy in the absence of dilution. We further consider other noise sources, such as randomness in either the initial condition or the threshold level, and find that in many cases, we need either strongly negative or positive feedback for precise scheduling for events.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistics of nascent and mature RNA fluctuations in a stochastic model of transcriptional initiation, elongation, pausing, and termination 97%
- Order-of-mutation effects on cancer progression: models for myeloproliferative neoplasm 96%
- Modelling Immune Dynamics in Locally Advanced MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer with Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Treatment: From Differential Equations to an Agent-Based Framework 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.