Motor Neuron Disease is not clustered or associated with socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland.
Chang, Y. T.; Kearns, P. K. A.; Newton, J.; Larraz, J.; Forbes, D.; Beswick, E.; Leighton, D.; Langlands, G.; Swingler, R. J.; Chandran, S.; Pal, S.; CARE-MND consortium,
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesUnderstanding risk factors and spatial variation of risk may provide insights into the pathological mechanism of motor neuron disease (MND). Socioeconomic status (SES) has been hypothesised as a risk factor, but results from previous studies are inconsistent. No spatial epidemiology studies examining geographic clustering of MND have been performed in Scotland to date. We investigated the effect of SES and geography on MND risk in Scotland using the highly curated and nationally representative Scottish MND Register (CARE-MND) that has over 95% case ascertainment. MethodsPatients on the Scottish Clinical Audit Research Evaluation for Motor Neurone Disease platform, with date of diagnosis between 01 Jan 2015 and 28 Feb 2021 were included and geocoded with data zones using their residence at diagnosis. Indirectly standardised incidence ratio (SIR) accounting for age and sex was calculated for each health board. Poisson regression was used to examine the effect of SES on MND risk, adjusted for age and sex of population at risk. Geographic clustering was assessed using global Morans Index, Bayesian conditional autoregressive models and SaTScan software. ResultsAmong 1149 patients included, 1126 (98%) were successfully geocoded. Significantly lower SIR was shown in Highland (0.60, 95% CI 0.44 - 0.80, p<0.001). After adjusting for age and sex in Poisson regression, there was no significant effect of SES on MND risk. Morans Index indicated a weak but significant spatial autocorrelation (I=0.017, p=0.008). However, risk maps using Bayesian modelling showed a relatively homogeneous distribution without distinct patterns across Scotland. Similarly, SaTScan did not detect any significant cluster of high or low risks. DiscussionOur findings support the notion that MND risk is mostly random-distributed and independent of SES in Scotland. Our results are generalizable to other MND populations.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality among Care Home Residents in England during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of 4.3 million adults over the age of 65 91%
- Extremely high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a strictly-Orthodox Jewish community in the UK 91%
- Temporal trends in the occurrence, mortality, and cost of brain disorders in Denmark 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study 93%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 91%
- The Incidence of Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Following COVID-19: a Matched Cohort Study in UK Primary Care 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation in children and adolescents in Norway: A nationwide population-based study. 92%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 92%
- Risk of death among teachers in England and Wales during the Covid19 pandemic 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.