Back

Data based slurry treatment decision tree to minimize antibiotic resistance and pathogen transfer while maximizing nutrient recycling

Do, T. T.; Nolan, S.; Hayes, N.; OFlaherty, V.; Burgess, C.; Brennan, F.; Walsh, F.

2022-02-28 microbiology
10.1101/2022.02.25.481976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Direct application of pig slurry to agricultural land, as a means of nutrient recycling, introduces pathogens, antibiotic resistant bacteria, or genes, to the environment. With global environmental sustainability policies mandating a reduction in synthetic fertilisation and a commitment to a circular economy it is imperative to find effective on-farm treatments of slurry that maximises its fertilisation value and minimises risk to health and the environment. We assessed and compared the effect of storage, composting, and anaerobic digestion on pig slurry microbiome, resistome and nutrient content. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and HT-qPCR arrays were implemented to understand the dynamics across the treatments. Our results identified that each of the treatment methods had advantages and disadvantages, depending on the parameter measured. The data suggests that storage and composting are optimal for the removal of human pathogens and anaerobic digestion for the reduction in AMR genes and mobile genetic elements. The nitrogen content is increased in storage and AD and reduced in composting. Thus, depending on the requirement for increased or reduced nitrogen the optimum treatment varies. Combining the results indicates that composting provides the greatest gain by reducing risk to human health and the environment. Network analysis revealed reducing Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes while increasing Firmicutes will reduce the AMR content. KEGG analysis identified no significant change in the pathways across all treatments. This novel study provides a data driven decision tree to determine the optimal treatment for best practice to minimise pathogen, AMR and excess or increasing nutrient transfer from slurry to environment. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=98 SRC="FIGDIR/small/481976v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@141af73org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@165bf42org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ef86c5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1790fca_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.