Back

Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis

Nettekoven, C. R.; Diederen, K.; Giles, O.; Duncan, H.; Stenson, I.; Olah, J.; Gibbs-Dean, T.; Collier, N.; Vertes, P. E.; Spencer, T. J.; Morgan, S. E.; McGuire, P.

2022-02-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.02.25.22271517
Show abstract

Background and HypothesisMapping a patients speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not incorporated the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study DesignWe developed an algorithm, "netts", to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample, and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls. Study ResultsSemantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomised networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the non-random nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more, smaller connected components. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signal not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. ConclusionsOverall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.

Matching journals

1
Translational Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 94 published papers
Top 0.9%
25× avg
2
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.4%
87× avg
3
Schizophrenia Research
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
210× avg
4
Schizophrenia
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 13 published papers
#1
160× avg
5
Biological Psychiatry
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 0.9%
32× avg
6
Psychological Medicine
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 52 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 31%
5.8%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
9
Molecular Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 84 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
20× avg
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 4%
6.7× avg
12
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg
13
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 93%
1.2%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
6.6× avg
15
JAMA Psychiatry
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
16
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 21 published papers
Top 4%
4.8× avg