Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis
Nettekoven, C. R.; Diederen, K.; Giles, O.; Duncan, H.; Stenson, I.; Olah, J.; Gibbs-Dean, T.; Collier, N.; Vertes, P. E.; Spencer, T. J.; Morgan, S. E.; McGuire, P.
Show abstract
Background and HypothesisMapping a patients speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not incorporated the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study DesignWe developed an algorithm, "netts", to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample, and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls. Study ResultsSemantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomised networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the non-random nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more, smaller connected components. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signal not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. ConclusionsOverall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing psychosis risk using quantitative markers of disorganised speech 96%
- Psychotic-like experiences, polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and structural properties of the salience, default mode and central-executive networks in healthy participants from UK Biobank 93%
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectivity patterns of task-specific brain networks allow individual prediction of cognitive symptom dimension of schizophrenia and link to molecular architecture 94%
- Network controllability in transmodal cortex predicts psychosis spectrum symptoms 93%
- Unique functional neuroimaging signatures of genetic versus clinical high risk for psychosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectome dysfunction in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis and modulation by oxytocin 94%
- Longitudinal evolution of the transdiagnostic prodrome to severe mental disorders: a dynamic temporal network analysis informed by natural language processing and electronic health records 93%
- Replication of a neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in psychosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who Does What to Whom? Graph Representations of Action-Predication in Speech Relate to Psychopathological Dimensions of Psychosis 94%
- Neurobiology-based Cognitive Biotypes Using Multi-scale Intrinsic Connectivity Networks in Psychotic Disorders 94%
- Multimodal fusion of brain signals for robust prediction of psychosis transition 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.