Back

The Impact of Protection Measures and Treatment onPneumonia Infection Model

Teklu, S. W.

2022-02-22 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.02.21.481255 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pneumonia has been a major airborne transmitted disease and continues to pose a major public health burden in both developed and developing countries of the world. In this study, we constructed and analyzed a nonlinear deterministic compartmental mathematical model for assessing the community-level impacts of vaccination, other protection measures like practicing good hygiene, avoiding close contacts with sick people and limiting exposure to cigarette smoke, etc. and treatment on the transmission dynamics of pneumonia disease in a population of varying size. Our model exhibits two kinds of equilibrium points: pneumonia disease-free equilibrium point, and pneumonia endemic equilibrium point(s). Using center manifold criteria, we have verified that the pneumonia model exhibits backward bifurcations whenever its effective reproduction number [R]P < 1 and in the same region, the model shows the existence of more than one endemic equilibrium point where some of which are stable and others are unstable. Thus, for pneumonia infection, the necessity of the pneumonia effective reproduction number [R]P < 1, although essential, it might not be enough to completely eradicate the pneumonia infection from the considered community. Our examination of sensitivity analysis shows that the pneumonia infection transmission rate denoted by {beta} plays a crucial role to change the qualitative dynamics of pneumonia infection. By taking standard data from published literature, our numerical computations show that the numerical value of pneumonia infection model effective reproduction number is [R]P = 8.31 at {beta} = 4.21 it implies that the disease spreads throughout the community. Finally, our numerical simulations show that protection, vaccination, and treatment against pneumonia disease have the effect of decreasing pneumonia expansion.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
3
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%