Back

Characterizing SARS-CoV-2 transcription of subgenomic and genomic RNAs during early human infection using multiplexed ddPCR

Hwang, H. S.; Lo, C.-M.; Murphy, M.; Grudda, T.; Gallagher, N.; Luo, C. H.; Robinson, M. L.; Mirza, A.; Conte, M.; Conte, A.; Zhou, R.; Brooke, C. B.; Pekosz, A.; Mostafa, H. H.; Manabe, Y. C.; Thio, C. L.; Balagopal, A.

2022-02-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.02.18.22271199 medRxiv
Show abstract

Control of SARS-CoV-2 (SCV-2) transmission is a major priority that requires understanding SCV-2 replication dynamics. We developed and validated novel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays to quantify SCV-2 subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs), which are only produced during active viral replication, and discriminate them from full-length genomic RNAs (gRNAs) in a multiplexed format. We applied this multiplex ddPCR assay to 144 cross-sectional nasopharyngeal samples. sgRNAs were quantifiable across a range of qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and correlated with Ct values. The ratio of sgRNA:gRNA was remarkably stable across a wide range of Ct values, whereas adjusted amounts of N sgRNA to a human housekeeping gene declined with higher Ct values. Interestingly, adjusted sgRNA and gRNA amounts were quantifiable in culture-negative samples, although levels were significantly lower than in culture-positive samples. Longitudinal daily testing of 6 persons for up to 14 days revealed that sgRNA is concordant with culture results during the first week of infection but may be discordant with culture later in infection. Further, sgRNA:gRNA is constant during infection despite changes in viral culture. These data indicate stable viral transcription during infection. More work is needed to understand why cultures are negative despite persistence of viral RNAs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.