Back

Reducing structural non-identifiabilities in upstream bioprocess models using profile-likelihood

Babel, H.; Omar, O.; Paul, A. J.; Baer, J.

2022-02-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.02.17.480405 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Process models are increasingly used to support upstream process development in the biopharmaceutical industry for process optimization, scale-up and to reduce experimental effort. Parametric unstructured models based biological mechanisms are highly promising, since they do not require large amounts of data. The critical part in the application is the certainty of the parameter estimates, since uncertainty of the parameter estimates propagates to model predictions and can increase the risk associated with those predictions. Currently Fisher-Information-Matrix based approximations or Monte-Carlo approaches are used to estimate parameter confidence intervals and regularization approaches to decrease parameter uncertainty. Here we apply profile likelihood to determine parameter identifiability of a recent upstream process model. We have investigated the effect of data amount on identifiability and found out that addition of data reduces non-identifiability. The likelihood profiles of non-identifiable parameters were then used to uncover structural model changes. These changes effectively alleviate the remaining non-identifiabilities except for a single parameter out of 21 total parameters. We present the first application of profile likelihood to a complete upstream process model. Profile likelihood is a highly suitable method to determine parameter confidence intervals in upstream process models and provides reliable estimates even with non-linear models and limited data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
IFAC-PapersOnLine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
4
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
9
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
21
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
24
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%