Back

The combination of autism and exceptional cognitive ability increases risk for suicidal ideation

Casten, L. G.; Thomas, T. R.; Doobay, A. F.; Foley-Nicpon, M.; Kramer, S.; Nickl-Jockschat, T.; Abel, T.; Assouline, S.; Michaelson, J. J.

2022-02-19 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.02.17.22271086 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autism with co-occurring exceptional cognitive ability is often accompanied by severe internalizing symptoms and feelings of inadequacy. Whether cognitive ability also translates into greater risk for suicidal ideation is unclear. To investigate this urgent question, we examined two samples of high-ability individuals with autism for factors that were predictive of suicidal ideation. In the first sample (N=1,074 individuals seen at a clinic specializing in gifted/talented youth), we observed a striking excess of parent-reported suicidal ideation in autistic individuals with IQ[&ge;]120 (OR=5.9, p = 0.0007). In separate sample of N=1,983 SPARK participants, we confirmed higher rates of suicidal thoughts compared to non-autistic children from the ABCD cohort (OR=6.8, p < 2.2 x 10-16), and further that autistic children with suicidal thoughts had significantly higher cognitive ability (p < 2.2 x 10-16) than those without. Elevated polygenic scores (PGS) for cognitive performance were associated with increased suicidal thoughts (Z = 2.16, p = 0.03), with PGS for educational attainment trending in the same direction (Z = 1.4, p = 0.17). Notably, similar results were found in parents of these autistic youth, where higher PGS for educational attainment was associated with increasing thoughts of suicide (Z=2.28, p=0.02). Taken together, these results suggest that on a phenotypic and genetic level, increasing cognitive ability is an unexpected risk factor for suicidal ideation in individuals diagnosed with, or at risk for autism.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.