Back

Leveraging genetics to improve Body Mass Index increase prediction in the first-episode of psychosis

Muntane, G.; Vazquez-Bourgon, J.; Sada, E.; Martorell, L.; Papiol, S.; Bosch, E.; Navarro, A.; Crespo-Facorro, B.; Vilella, E.

2022-02-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.02.15.22270982 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) show rapid weight gain during the first months of treatment, which is associated with reduction in psychiatric and physical health. Although genetics is assumed to be a significant contributor to this weight gain, its exact role is unknown. MethodsReference GWAS from BMI and SCZ were obtained to evaluate the pleiotropic landscape between both traits using the pleioFDR software. In parallel, we gathered a population-based FEP cohort of 381 individuals and BMI Polygenic risk-scores (PRS) were evaluated on a sample of 224 individuals. Subsequently, the PRSs obtained from both BMI and the variants shared between the two traits were incorporated into risk models that included demographic and clinical variable to predict BMI increase ({Delta}BMI) on an independent sample of 157 patients. ResultsBMI PRS significantly improved the prediction of absolute BMI and {Delta}BMI during the first 12 months after the onset of psychotic symptoms. This improvement, was mainly explained by shared variants between SCZ and BMI. In contrast, absolute BMI was predicted mainly by non-shared variants. ConclusionsWe validated, for the first time, that genetic factors play a key in the determination of both BMI and {Delta}BMI in FEP. This finding has important clinical implications in identifying individuals who require specific treatment strategies. Improved risk classification may help prevent associated adverse metabolic events, and reduce overtreatment and costs for both individuals and the healthcare system. It also highlights the importance of studying genetic pleiotropy in the context of medically important comorbidities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.5%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
10
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
15
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
22
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%