Back

Leveraging genetics to improve Body Mass Index increase prediction in the first-episode of psychosis

Muntane, G.; Vazquez-Bourgon, J.; Sada, E.; Martorell, L.; Papiol, S.; Bosch, E.; Navarro, A.; Crespo-Facorro, B.; Vilella, E.

2022-02-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.02.15.22270982 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) show rapid weight gain during the first months of treatment, which is associated with reduction in psychiatric and physical health. Although genetics is assumed to be a significant contributor to this weight gain, its exact role is unknown. MethodsReference GWAS from BMI and SCZ were obtained to evaluate the pleiotropic landscape between both traits using the pleioFDR software. In parallel, we gathered a population-based FEP cohort of 381 individuals and BMI Polygenic risk-scores (PRS) were evaluated on a sample of 224 individuals. Subsequently, the PRSs obtained from both BMI and the variants shared between the two traits were incorporated into risk models that included demographic and clinical variable to predict BMI increase ({Delta}BMI) on an independent sample of 157 patients. ResultsBMI PRS significantly improved the prediction of absolute BMI and {Delta}BMI during the first 12 months after the onset of psychotic symptoms. This improvement, was mainly explained by shared variants between SCZ and BMI. In contrast, absolute BMI was predicted mainly by non-shared variants. ConclusionsWe validated, for the first time, that genetic factors play a key in the determination of both BMI and {Delta}BMI in FEP. This finding has important clinical implications in identifying individuals who require specific treatment strategies. Improved risk classification may help prevent associated adverse metabolic events, and reduce overtreatment and costs for both individuals and the healthcare system. It also highlights the importance of studying genetic pleiotropy in the context of medically important comorbidities.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.