Back

Operationalising the Centiloid Scale for florbetapir PET Studies on PET/MR

Coath, W.; Modat, M.; Cardoso, M. J.; Markiewicz, P.; Lane, C. A.; Parker, T. D.; Keshavan, A.; Buchanan, S. M.; Keuss, S. E.; Harris, M. J.; Burgos, N.; Dickson, J.; Barnes, A.; Thomas, D. L.; Beasley, D.; Malone, I. B.; Wong, A.; Erlandsson, K.; Thomas, B. A.; Schöll, M.; Ourselin, S.; Richards, M.; Fox, N. C.; Schott, J. M.; Cash, D. M.

2022-02-15 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.02.11.22270590 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe Centiloid scale provides a systematic means of harmonising amyloid-{beta} PET measures across different acquisition and processing methodologies. This work explores the Centiloid transformation of [18F]florbetapir PET data acquired on a combined PET/MR scanner and processed with methods that differ from the standard Centiloid pipeline. MethodsThe Standard PiB and Florbetapir Calibration datasets were processed using a standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR) pipeline with MRI parcellations from the Geodesic Information Flow (GIF) algorithm in native PET space. We generated SUVRs using whole cerebellum (GIF_WCSUVR) and eroded white matter (GIF_WMSUVR) reference regions, with and without partial volume correction (PVC). Linear regression was used to calibrate these processing pipelines to the standard Centiloid approach. We then applied the resulting transformation to 432 florbetapir scans from the Insight 46 study of mostly cognitively normal individuals aged [~]70 years, and defined Centiloid cutpoints for amyloid-{beta} positivity using Gaussian-mixture modelling. ResultsGIF-based SUVR processing pipelines were suitable for conversion according to Centiloid criteria. For GIF_WCSUVR, cutpoints translated to 14.2 Centiloids, or 11.8 with PVC. There was a differential relationship between florbetapir uptake in WM and WC regions in Florbetapir Calibration and Insight 46 datasets, causing implausibly low Centiloid values for GIF_WMSUVR. Linear adjustment to account for this difference resulted in Centiloid cutpoints of 18.1 for GIF_WMSUVR (17.0 with PVC). ConclusionOur results show florbetapir SUVRs acquired on PET/MR scanners can be reliably converted to Centiloids. Acquisition or biological factors can have large effects on Centiloid values from different datasets, we propose a correction to account for these effects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%