Back

Description of Pectobacterium pacificum sp. nov. isolated from Colocasia esculenta

Arif, M.; Komal, K.; Klair, D.; Arizala, D.; Mishra, A.; Boluk, G.; Waleron, M.; Alvarez, A. M.; Dobhal, S.

2026-10-08 microbiology
10.1101/2022.02.08.479620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pectobacterium comprises Gram-negative, pectinolytic plant pathogens that cause soft rot and blackleg diseases on numerous economically important crops. During sampling in 2018 in taro (Colocasia esculenta) fields in Hawaii, two bacterial strains PL152T and PL155 were isolated from taro. Peliminary molecular characterization placed both strains in the genus Pectobacterium. However, their taxanomic postions could not be resoved at the species level. A polyphasic taxonomic approach incorporating phenotypic characterization, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), whole genome based phylogeny, average nucleotide identity (ANI), and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) was therefore employed to determine their taxonomic status. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses consistently placed PL152 and PL155 together in a distinct and well supported lineage within the genus Pectobacterium, separate from currently recognized species. The two strains exhibited high genomic relatedness to each other, whereas the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values, were lower than the accepted species delineation thresholds of 95% and 70%, respectively, supported the delineation of a novel bacterial species. The genomic characteristic of PL152 included a genome size of 5.02 Mb and a DNA G+C content of 52%. Collectively, based on a polyphasic approach including phylogenetic, phlyogenomic, biochemical, and phenotypic evidences supports the classification of strains PL152 and PL155 as representatives of a novel species within the genus Pectobacterium, for which the name Pectobacterium pacificum sp. nov. is proposed. Strain PL152 (ICMP 2436274, LMG 32536) is designated as the type strain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.