Heterogeneity of Irritability: Psychometrics of The Irritability and Dysregulation of Emotion Scale (TIDES-13).
Dissanayake, A. S.; Dupuis, A.; Arnold, P. D.; Burton, C.; Crosbie, J.; Schachar, R. J.; Levy, T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe designed The Irritability and Dysregulation of Emotion Scale (TIDES-13) to test whether irritability consisted of several sub-dimensions that would correlate differentially with internalizing/externalizing psychopathology, age, and gender. MethodParent-report (n = 3935, mean age = 8.9) and youth self-report (n = 579, mean age = 15.1) versions of TIDES-13 were administered to a population-based sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on separate sub-samples. We fit multivariable regression models between TIDES-13 sub-dimensions and age, gender, anxiety, depression, ODD and ADHD trait levels. ResultsA higher order model with a global irritability dimension and Proneness to Anger, Internalized Negative Emotional Reactivity, Externalized Negative Emotional Reactivity and Reactive Aggression sub-dimensions showed good to excellent fit in both parent-report and self-report. The global irritability dimension had a strong influence on all item variance ({omega}Hierarchical; parent report = .0.94, {omega}Hierarchical; self report = .90). Proneness to Anger, Externalized Negative Emotional Reactivity and Reactive Aggression decreased with age in males, whereas Internal Negative Emotional Reactivity increased with age in females. Internalized Negative Emotional Reactivity was associated with internalizing traits, over and above global irritability. ODD and ADHD were predicted primarily by the global irritability. ConclusionAlthough irritability can be estimated as an essentially unidimensional construct, differential associations of Internalized Negative Emotional Reactivity with gender and age, and internalizing psychopathology warrant examination in clinical populations. These results support TIDES-13 as a reliable and valid multidimensional measure of irritability and thus may be useful for research and clinical purposes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 94%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 94%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) emotional subscale in assessing depression and anxiety across development 95%
- Mindfulness supports emotional resilience in children during the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.