Back

Post marketing surveillance for Microwave Treatment of Plantar and Common Warts in Adults.

Bristow, I.

2022-02-09 dermatology
10.1101/2022.02.08.22270290 medRxiv
Show abstract

A handheld microwave device (Swift(R), Emblation Limited) has been licenced and available for clinical use since 2016 in the fields of podiatry and dermatology and has been extensively used in treating cutaneous warts. As part of post marketing surveillance by the manufacturer, an online 79-item survey was distributed to podiatry clinics in the United Kingdom with a Swift(R) device. A total of 126 clinics responded (59.6%). 6998 adults (<65 years) underwent wart treatment with microwave (81.9% plantar warts; 18.1% common, non-plantar warts). The median efficacy rate was reported as 79.2% (65.9 - 87.5%) and 82.3% (71.4 - 100%) respectively. In older adults (over 65 years) efficacy rates were similar for both sites: plantar (73.2%, 50-90%, n=1232) and non-plantar (80.0%, 42.1-100%, n=276). A median of three treatments was required to bring about resolution. Sub-group analysis of the data revealed good clearance rates in patients with diabetes (79.6%), but less in immunocompromised individuals (61.3%) and those with autoimmune disease (58.6%). Overall, mean user satisfaction was rated as "very satisfied" on a 10-point scale (n=93 practices). A small number of adverse events were reported including blistering, superficial ulceration and poor healing were reported (n=7). Despite the limitations of a post-marketing questionnaire survey, these data provide good evidence of the safety and efficacy for Swift(R) microwave treatment of cutaneous warts. What is already known about this topic?O_LIMicrowave treatment has shown to be effective in the treatment of cutaneous warts. C_LI What does the study add?O_LIThis survey of clinics using SWIFT microwave treatments reports on the effectiveness and safety of the device in the treatment of 8506 adult patients with common and plantar warts. C_LIO_LIResponding user clinics reporting efficacy with good clearance rates and low levels of adverse events demonstrating microwave is a safe and effective treatment for plantar and common warts. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
17
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%