Back

Characteristics and preparedness for COVID-19 outbreaks of Australian residential aged care facilities: A cross-sectional survey

Gilbert, G. L.; Smith, J.; Cvejic, E.; Lilly, A.; McCaffery, K.

2022-02-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2022.02.05.22270416 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo provide an overview of Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) COVID-19 outbreak preparedness and responses, 12 months after the pandemic began in early 2020. MethodsA cross-sectional survey of RACF managers was conducted as part of an overview of COVID-19 experience during 2020. Survey questions were based on findings of previous outbreak reviews. ResultsComparison with available data from the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare suggested that survey respondents (n=331) were a representative sample. Almost all RACFs had outbreak management plans, including provision for a surge workforce. However, anticipated staff replacements fell short of those often required during outbreaks. Staff of most (83%) RACFs had completed online infection control training, and a smaller proportion (73%) face-to-face training, by the time of the survey. Exploratory analyses to identify RACF characteristics associated with increased outbreak risk found a strong association with location in Victoria (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 12.8) where most community transmission occurred during 2020. The only other association was an increased risk in facilities where all staff had not completed face-to-face infection control training (aRR 2.1). Respondents ranked leadership and management; planning and preparation; and infection control as the top three of seven critical lines of defence against COVID-19. ConclusionSurvey results suggest that, in early 2021, most Australian RACFs were better prepared for the ongoing risk of COVID-19 than in 2020. Continued implementation of the Aged Care Royal Commissions recommendations is needed to ensure the aged care sector is prepared for future infectious disease emergencies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.