Vital signs as a source of racial bias
Velichkovska, B.; Gjoreski, H.; Denkovski, D.; Kalendar, M.; Mamandipoor, B.; Celi, L. A.; Osmani, V.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSracial bias has been shown to be present in clinical data, affecting patients unfairly based on their race, ethnicity and socio-economic status. This problem has the potential to be significantly exacerbated in the light of Artificial Intelligence-aided clinical decision making. We sought to investigate whether bias can be introduced from sources that are considered neutral with respect to ethnicity and race and consequently routinely used in modelling, specifically vital signs. Methodsto perform our analysis, we extracted vital signs from 49,610 admissions from a cohort of adult patients during the first 24 hours after the admission to the Intensive Care Units (ICU), derived from multi-centre eICU-CRD database and single-centre MIMIC-III database, spanning over 208 hospitals and 335 ICUs. Using heart rate, SaO2, respiratory rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, we develop machine learning models based on Logistic Regression and eXtreme Gradient Boosting and investigate their performance in predicting patients self-reported race. To balance the dataset between the three ethno-races considered in our study, we use a matching cohort based on age, gender, and admission diagnosis. Findingsstandard machine learning models, derived solely on six vital signs can be used to predict patients self-reported race with AUC of 75%. Our findings hold under diverse patient populations, derived from multiple hospitals and intensive care units. We also show that oxygen saturation is a highly predictive variable, even when measured through methods other than pulse oximetry, namely arterial blood gas analysis, suggesting that addressing bias in routinely collected clinical variables will be challenging. Interpretationour finding that machine learning models can predict self-reported race using solely vital signs creates a significant risk in clinical decision making, further exacerbating racial inequalities, with highly challenging mitigation measures. FundingThe funders had no role in the design of this study.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 97%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 96%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 97%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 97%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Visual Photoplethysmography Method 92%
- Benchmarking Deep Learning-based Image Retrieval of Oral Tumor Histology 91%
- A quantum-enhanced precision medicine application to support data-driven clinical decisions for the personalized treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis: development and preliminary validation of precisionKNEE_QNN 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.