TEXT MINING OF THE PEOPLE's PHARMACY RADIO SHOW TRANSCRIPTS CAN IDENTIFY NOVEL DRUG REPURPOSING HYPOTHESES
Yedida, R.; Beasley, J.-M.; Korn, D.; Abrar, S.; Melo-Filho, C.; Muratov, E.; Graedon, J.; Graedon, T.; Chirkova, R.; Tropsha, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveSocial media mining may provide surprising information about unknown effects of drugs. We endeavored to uncover such unknown drug-disease relationships by text mining of audio record transcripts from the popular NPR show, The Peoples Pharmacy. Materials and MethodsWe used Google Cloud to transcribe episodes of the NPR podcast into textual documents. We then built a pipeline for systematically pre-processing the text to ensure quality input to the core classification model. Finally, results of the model were filtered by a series of post-processing steps. Our classification model itself uses the FLAIR language model pre-trained on PubMed abstracts. The modular nature of our pipeline allows for ease of future developments in this area by substituting higher quality components at each stage of the pipeline. To validate the drug-disease relating assertions extracted from the podcast, we utilized the DrugCentral database and ROBOKOP biomedical knowledge graph, which capture drug-disease relationships for FDA approved medications. ResultsOur model identified 128 drug-disease pairs that were found in DrugCentral and 112 novel candidate pairs requiring expert review. To demonstrate the expert review process, we found literature evidence supporting the assertions for novel drug-disease pairs. Discussion and ConclusionText mining of social media is increasingly used to uncover novel relationships between semantic concepts corresponding to biomedical concepts. However, mining audio transcripts of specialized podcast shows has not been explored previously for this purpose. Using this approach, we have identified several unknown drug-disease relationships with support in biomedical literature. The proposed approach can extend beyond radio podcasts and could be applied to any source of audio and textual data.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 96%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 95%
- Using indication embeddings to represent patient health for drug safety studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Knowledge Fusion Models on Detecting Adverse Drug Events in Text 97%
- Inferring Gender from First Names: Comparing the Accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R Package on Authors of Diverse Nationality 93%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction for Language Models 95%
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools 95%
- Active Neural Networks to Detect Mentions of Changes to Medication Treatment in Social Media 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.