SARS-CoV-2 Variant Surveillance Using Tandem Targeted RT-PCR-based Genotyping Assays and Whole Genome Sequencing
Pinkhover, N. P.; Sanchez, E.; Pontbriand, K. M.; Okello, K.; Garvey, L. M.; Fletcher, K. P.; Pum, A.; Li, K.; DeOliveira, G.; Proctor, T. B.; Feenstra, J. D. M.; Sorel, O.; Gandhi, M.; Auclair, J.
Show abstract
Genomic surveillance is critical for tracking SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern (VOC) and for rapid detection of emerging variants. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is the predominant method for genomic surveillance; but it is a laborious process for large-scale testing. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a PCR-based mutation panel for the discrimination of 5 known VOC; Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529). Genotyping analysis was performed on 128 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples collected at the Life Science Testing Center at Northeastern University from April-December 2021. RNA extraction was performed using MagMax Viral/Pathogen II Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit. SARS-CoV-2 detection was confirmed using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit. Variant determination was conducted using a panel of TaqMan SARS-CoV-2 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays. On November 25, 2021, the emerging VOC (Omicron) was reported by South Africa and the panel was quickly modified to detect Omicron by substituting P681H and K417N assays. Based on the SNP panel analysis, variant identification in 128 samples were as follows: Alpha (N=34), Beta (N=1), Gamma (N=7), Delta (N=41) and Omicron (N=21). The genotyping panel accurately assigned lineages to 104 samples, confirmed by Ion Torrent GeneStudio S5 WGS. VOC discrimination using RT-PCR genotyping is a rapid, versatile method for detecting known and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. The versatility of SNP panels allows monitoring of emerging strains by simple layout adaptations. RT-PCR genotyping assays can expedite variant identification, enable high-throughput variant surveillance, and support WGS prioritization for detection of new variants.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly-Sensitive Lineage Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Variants through Allele-Specific Probe Polymerase Chain Reaction 95%
- Performance evaluation of the BD SARS-CoV-2 reagents for the BD MAX™ system 94%
- Multiplex SARS-CoV-2 Genotyping PCR for Population-Level Variant Screening and Epidemiologic Surveillance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture 94%
- The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs 93%
- Clinical Validation of a Novel T-cell Receptor Sequencing Assay for Identification of Recent or Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Production and performance assessment of a SARS-CoV-2 biomimetic in a verification program for pandemic readiness 93%
- A comparative study of real-time RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and its application to human derived and surface swabbed material 93%
- Association of COVID-19 RT-qPCR test false-negative rate with patient age, sex and time since diagnosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of pneumococcal carriage in asymptomatic healthcare workers 92%
- Clinical assessment and validation of a rapid and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 test using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification 92%
- Rapid base-specific calling of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern using combined RT-PCR melting curve screening and SIRPH technology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Avoiding false positive SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test results with point-of-care molecular testing on residual test buffer 96%
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 95%
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.